Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Prednisolone adverse events in the treatment and prevention of leprosy neuropathy in two large double blind randomized clinical trials

  • Erik Post*
  • , Inge Wagenaar
  • , Wim Brandsma
  • , Bob Bowers
  • , Khorshed Alam
  • , Vanaja Shetty
  • , Vivek Pai
  • , Sajid Husain
  • , Cita Rosita Sigit Prakoeswa
  • , Linda Astari
  • , Deanna Hagge
  • , Mahesh Shah
  • , Kapil Neupane
  • , Krishna Lama
  • , Peter Nicholls
  • , Jan Hendrik Richardus
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Royal Tropical Institute
  • The Leprosy Mission International Bangladesh
  • Foundation for Medical Research
  • Bombay Leprosy Project
  • JALMA institute of Leprosy & Other Mycobacterial Diseases
  • Universitas Airlangga
  • The Leprosy Mission Nepal
  • Lalgadh Leprosy Hospital and Services Centre Dhanusha
  • University of Southampton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
109 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objectives To document serious adverse events (SAE) of prolonged prednisolone use in two double-blind randomized clinical trials (RCT). In the first RCT, treatment effectiveness on restoring nerve function of a 20-week prednisolone regimen was compared with a 32-week course. In the second RCT, patients with subclinical neuropathy received either 20 weeks prednisolone or placebo to assess whether prednisolone could prevent the development of clinical neuropathy. In both trials, patients received a prednisolone starting dose according to weight: high weight (≥50 kg) started at 60 mg and low weight (<50 kg) at 45 mg. In both trials, the occurrence of serious adverse events (SAE) was an important secondary outcome. Results In the first RCT, 868 patients were enrolled, of whom 16 (1.8%) developed a serious adverse event (SAE). There were 12 SAEs in the longer treatment arm (N = 439, event rate of 2.7%), and four in the shorter arm (N = 429, event rate of 0.9%) (p = 0.041). In the second RCT 4/364 (1.1%) developed an SAE, of which one was in the placebo arm. In both trials, minor adverse events were quite common and varied greatly in frequency and between centres. Conclusions When searching for the optimum dose and duration of prednisolone in the treatment and prevention of neuropathy in leprosy patients, one must weigh possible advantages against the possible serious adverse events. Although our trials showed a significantly increased percentage of SAE in the longer treatment arm in the first RCT and in the treatment arm of the second RCT, the overall event rate was very low.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)236-246
Number of pages11
JournalLeprosy Review
Volume92
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
We are immensely grateful to the patients that were willing to participate in this study. Also, we would like to thank the funders: The American Leprosy Mission, the German Leprosy and TB Relief Association, The Netherlands Leprosy Relief, the Ordre de Malte, and the Turing Foundation.

Publisher Copyright:
© The author(s).

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prednisolone adverse events in the treatment and prevention of leprosy neuropathy in two large double blind randomized clinical trials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this