Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Preoperative misdiagnosis of pancreatic and periampullary cancer in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy: A multicentre retrospective cohort study

  • Stijn van Roessel
  • , Eline C. Soer
  • , Lois A. Daamen
  • , Demi van Dalen
  • , Arantza Farina Sarasqueta
  • , Martijn W. J. Stommel
  • , I. Quintus Molenaar
  • , Hjalmar C. van Santvoort
  • , Vincent C. J. van de Vlasakker
  • , Ignace H. J. T. de Hingh
  • , Jesse Groen
  • , J. Sven D. Mieog
  • , Jacob L. van Dam
  • , Casper H. J. van Eijck
  • , Geertjan van Tienhoven
  • , Heinz-Josef Klumpen
  • , Johanna W. Wilmink
  • , Olivier R. Busch
  • , Lodewijk A. A. Brosens
  • , Bas Groot Koerkamp
  • Joanne Verheij, Marc G. Besselink
  • Amsterdam UMC
  • Utrecht University
  • Radboud University Nijmegen
  • St. Antonius Ziekenhuis
  • Catharina Hospital
  • Leiden University
  • University of Amsterdam
  • Leiden University Medical Centre

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

43 Citations (Scopus)
153 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Introduction: Whereas neoadjuvant chemo(radio)therapy is increasingly used in pancreatic cancer, it is currently not recommended for other periampullary (non-pancreatic) cancers. This has important implications for the relevance of the preoperative diagnosis for pancreatoduodenectomy. This retrospective multicentre cohort study aimed to determine the frequency of clinically relevant misdiagnoses in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic or other periampullary cancer. Methods: Data from all consecutive patients who underwent a pancreatoduodenectomy between 2014 and 2018 were obtained from the prospective Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit. The preoperative diagnosis as concluded by the multidisciplinary team (MDT) meeting was compared with the final postoperative diagnosis at pathology to determine the rate of clinically relevant misdiagnosis (defined as missed pancreatic cancer or incorrect diagnosis of pancreatic cancer). Results: In total, 1244 patients underwent pancreatoduodenectomy of whom 203 (16%) had a clinically relevant misdiagnosis preoperatively. Of all patients with a final diagnosis of pancreatic cancer, 13% (87/ 679) were preoperatively misdiagnosed as distal cholangiocarcinoma (n = 41, 6.0%), ampullary cancer (n = 27, 4.0%) duodenal cancer (n = 16, 2.4%), or other (n = 3, 0.4%). Of all patients with a final diagnosis of periampullary (non-pancreatic) cancer, 21% (116/565) were preoperatively incorrectly diagnosed as pancreatic cancer. Accuracy of preoperative diagnosis was 84% for pancreatic cancer, 71% for distal cholangiocarcinoma, 73% for ampullary cancer and 73% for duodenal cancer. A prediction model for the preoperative likelihood of pancreatic cancer (versus other periampullary cancer) prior to pancreatoduodenectomy demonstrated an AUC of 0.88. Discussion: This retrospective multicentre cohort study showed that 16% of patients have a clinically relevant misdiagnosis that could result in either missing the opportunity of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with pancreatic cancer or inappropriate administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with non-pancreatic periampullary cancer. A preoperative prediction model is available on www.pancreascalculator.com. (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2525-2532
Number of pages8
JournalEuropean Journal of Surgical Oncology
Volume47
Issue number10
Early online dateSept 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Preoperative misdiagnosis of pancreatic and periampullary cancer in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy: A multicentre retrospective cohort study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this