Prevalence of anatomical variants and coronary anomalies in 543 consecutive patients studied with 64-slice CT coronary angiography

F. Cademartiri, L (La) la Grutta, R Malago, F (Fillippo) Alberghina, Bob Meijboom, F Pugliese, E Maffei, AA Palumbo, A Aldrovandi, M Fusaro, V Brambilla, P Coruzzi, M Midiri, Nico Mollet, Gabriel Krestin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

144 Citations (Scopus)
8 Downloads (Pure)


The aim of our study was to assess the prevalence of variants and anomalies of the coronary artery tree in patients who underwent 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography (CT-CA) for suspected or known coronary artery disease. A total of 543 patients (389 male, mean age 60.5 +/- 10.9) were reviewed for coronary artery variants and anomalies including post-processing tools. The majority of segments were identified according to the American Heart Association scheme. The coronary dominance pattern results were: right, 86.6%; left, 9.2%; balanced, 4.2%. The left main coronary artery had a mean length of 112 +/- 55 mm. The intermediate branch was present in the 21.9%. A variable number of diagonals (one, 25%; two, 49.7%; more than two, 24%; none, 1.3%) and marginals (one, 35.2%; two, 46.2%; more than two, 18%; none, 0.6%) was visualized. Furthermore, CT-CA may visualize smaller branches such as the conus branch artery (98%), the sinus node artery (91.6%), and the septal branches (93%). Single or associated coronary anomalies occurred in 18.4% of the patients, with the following distribution: 43 anomalies of origin and course, 68 intrinsic anomalies (59 myocardial bridging, nine aneurisms), three fistulas. In conclusion, 64-slice CT-CA provides optimal visualization of the variable and complex anatomy of coronary arteries because of the improved isotropic spatial resolution and flexible post-processing tool.
Original languageUndefined/Unknown
Pages (from-to)781-791
Number of pages11
JournalEuropean Radiology
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Research programs

  • EMC NIHES-03-30-01

Cite this