Prognostic significance of renal function in patients undergoing dobutamine stress echocardiography

SE Karagiannis, HHH (Harm) Feringa, AAHA El-Hendy, Ron van Domburg, M Chonchol, R (Radosav) Vidakovic, JJ Bax, G Karatasakis, G Athanasopoulos, DV Cokkinos, D Poldermans

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) is used for risk stratification of patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). However, the prognostic value of DSE among the entire strata of renal function has yet to be determined. We assessed the prognostic value of renal function relative to DSE findings. Methods. We studied 2292 patients, divided into 729 (32%) patients with normal renal function creatinine clearance (CrCl) >90 ml/min and 1563 (68%) with renal dysfunction, classified as mild (CrCl: 60-90 ml/min) in 933, moderate (CrCl: 30-60 ml/min) in 502 and severe (CrCl < 30ml/min) in 128 patients. All patients underwent DSE for the evaluation of known or suspected CAD and were followed for a mean of 8 years. Results. New wall motion abnormalities during DSE and mildly, moderately and severely abnormal CrCl were powerful independent predictors for all-cause mortality, cardiac death and hard cardiac events (cardiac death and non-fatal myocardial infarction). KaplanMeier curves demonstrated that patients with normal DSE and renal dysfunction have greater probability for cardiac death and hard cardiac events compared to those with normal renal function. The warranty of a normal DSE in the presence of moderate renal dysfunction was 15 and 36 months for 10 and 20% risk for cardiac death and hard cardiac events, respectively. Conclusions. The presence and severity of renal dysfunction has additional independent prognostic value over DSE findings. The low-risk warrantee period after a normal DSE is determined by the severity of renal dysfunction.
Original languageUndefined/Unknown
Pages (from-to)601-607
Number of pages7
JournalNephrology Dialysis Transplantation
Volume23
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Cite this