Proselytism and Ostentation: A Critical Discourse Analysis of the European Court of Human Rights

Giulia Evolvi*, Mauro Gatti

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This article focuses on the European Court of Human Rights’ (ECtHR) case law about religious symbols (N=27) from 2001 to 2018, exploring the following questions: What discourses does the ECtHR employ in cases about religious symbols? How do ECtHR’s discourses about religious symbols evolve in time? The data is innovatively analyzed through critical discourse analysis and leads to two findings: first, the ECtHR tends to endorse ‘Christian secularism,’ considering Christian symbols as compatible with secularism but not Muslim symbols; second, ECtHR discourses occasionally become more favorable to Muslim applicants over time, but the evolution of case law is not linear.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)162-188
Number of pages27
JournalJournal of Religion in Europe
Volume14
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 26 Jul 2021

Research programs

  • ESHCC M&C

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Proselytism and Ostentation: A Critical Discourse Analysis of the European Court of Human Rights'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this