Abstract
The contemporary plea for a more liberal pathological definition of insignificant prostate cancer was recently challenged by Schiffmann and colleagues, who advocate a return to the original, stringent 0.5 ml tumour volume threshold. This cut-off point would render fewer men eligible for active surveillance programmes.
Original language | Undefined/Unknown |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 10-U135 |
Journal | Nature Reviews Urology |
Volume | 12 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2015 |
Research programs
- EMC MM-03-49-01