Psychometric properties of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system scale v1.2: global health (PROMIS-GH) in a Dutch general population

Leonardo Pellicciari; Alessandro Chiarotto; Emanuele Giusti; Martine H.P. Crins; Leo D. Roorda; Caroline B. Terwee

doi:10.1186/s12955-021-01855-0

Psychometric properties of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system scale v1.2: global health (PROMIS-GH) in a Dutch general population

Leonardo Pellicciari, Alessandro Chiarotto, Emanuele Giusti, Martine H.P. Crins, Leo D. Roorda, Caroline B. Terwee^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

General Practice

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

85 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the psychometric properties of the Dutch-Flemish Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Scale v1.2 – Global Health (PROMIS-GH). Methods: The PROMIS-GH (also referred to as PROMIS-10) was administered to 4370 persons from the Dutch general population. Unidimensionality (CFI ≥ 0.95; TLI ≥ 0.95; RMSEA ≤ 0.06; SRMR ≤ 0.08), local independence (residual correlations < 0.20), monotonicity (H > 0.30), model fit with the Graded Response Model (GRM, p < 0.001), internal consistency (alpha > 0.75), precision (total score information across the latent trait), measurement invariance (no Differential Item Functioning [DIF]), and cross-cultural validity (no DIF for language, Dutch vs. United States English) of its subscales, composed of four items each, Global Mental Health (GMH) and Global Physical Health (GPH), were assessed. Results: Confirmatory factor analyses, on both subscales, revealed slight departures from unidimensionality for GMH (CFI = 0.98; TLI = 0.95, RMSEA = 0.22; SRMR = 0.04) and GPH (CFI = 0.99; TLI = 0.97; RMSEA = 0.12; SRMR = 0.03). Local independence, monotonicity, GRM model fit, internal consistency, precision and cross-cultural validity were supported. However, Global10 (emotional problems) showed misfit on the GMH subscale, while Global08 (fatigue) presented DIF for age. Conclusion: The psychometric properties of the PROMIS-GH in the Dutch population were considered acceptable. Sufficient local independence, monotonicity, GRM fit, internal consistency, measurement invariance and cross-cultural validity were found. If future studies find similar results, structural validity of the GMH could be enhanced by improving or replacing Global10 (emotional problems).

Original language	English
Article number	226
Number of pages	17
Journal	Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
Volume	19
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-021-01855-0
Publication status	Published - 27 Sept 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding
The data collection for this project was financially supported by the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics of the VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. This project was financially supported by the Virtutis Opus foundation. LP was (partially) supported by funding of the Italian Ministry of Health (ricerca corrente). AC is funded by fellowships from the Amsterdam Movement Sciences research institute.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s).

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1186/s12955-021-01855-0

Pellicciari2021_Article_PsychometricPropertiesOfThePatLicence: CC BY

Cite this

@article{0ec64cef4b3141929938fe21d664e368,

title = "Psychometric properties of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system scale v1.2: global health (PROMIS-GH) in a Dutch general population",

abstract = "Purpose: To assess the psychometric properties of the Dutch-Flemish Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Scale v1.2 – Global Health (PROMIS-GH). Methods: The PROMIS-GH (also referred to as PROMIS-10) was administered to 4370 persons from the Dutch general population. Unidimensionality (CFI ≥ 0.95; TLI ≥ 0.95; RMSEA ≤ 0.06; SRMR ≤ 0.08), local independence (residual correlations < 0.20), monotonicity (H > 0.30), model fit with the Graded Response Model (GRM, p < 0.001), internal consistency (alpha > 0.75), precision (total score information across the latent trait), measurement invariance (no Differential Item Functioning [DIF]), and cross-cultural validity (no DIF for language, Dutch vs. United States English) of its subscales, composed of four items each, Global Mental Health (GMH) and Global Physical Health (GPH), were assessed. Results: Confirmatory factor analyses, on both subscales, revealed slight departures from unidimensionality for GMH (CFI = 0.98; TLI = 0.95, RMSEA = 0.22; SRMR = 0.04) and GPH (CFI = 0.99; TLI = 0.97; RMSEA = 0.12; SRMR = 0.03). Local independence, monotonicity, GRM model fit, internal consistency, precision and cross-cultural validity were supported. However, Global10 (emotional problems) showed misfit on the GMH subscale, while Global08 (fatigue) presented DIF for age. Conclusion: The psychometric properties of the PROMIS-GH in the Dutch population were considered acceptable. Sufficient local independence, monotonicity, GRM fit, internal consistency, measurement invariance and cross-cultural validity were found. If future studies find similar results, structural validity of the GMH could be enhanced by improving or replacing Global10 (emotional problems).",

author = "Leonardo Pellicciari and Alessandro Chiarotto and Emanuele Giusti and Crins, {Martine H.P.} and Roorda, {Leo D.} and Terwee, {Caroline B.}",

note = "Funding The data collection for this project was financially supported by the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics of the VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. This project was financially supported by the Virtutis Opus foundation. LP was (partially) supported by funding of the Italian Ministry of Health (ricerca corrente). AC is funded by fellowships from the Amsterdam Movement Sciences research institute. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021, The Author(s).",

year = "2021",

month = sep,

day = "27",

doi = "10.1186/s12955-021-01855-0",

language = "English",

volume = "19",

journal = "Health and Quality of Life Outcomes",

issn = "1477-7525",

publisher = "BioMed Central Ltd.",

number = "1",

}

Psychometric properties of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system scale v1.2: global health (PROMIS-GH) in a Dutch general population. / Pellicciari, Leonardo; Chiarotto, Alessandro; Giusti, Emanuele et al.
In: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, Vol. 19, No. 1, 226, 27.09.2021.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Psychometric properties of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system scale v1.2

T2 - global health (PROMIS-GH) in a Dutch general population

AU - Pellicciari, Leonardo

AU - Chiarotto, Alessandro

AU - Giusti, Emanuele

AU - Crins, Martine H.P.

AU - Roorda, Leo D.

AU - Terwee, Caroline B.

N1 - Funding The data collection for this project was financially supported by the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics of the VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. This project was financially supported by the Virtutis Opus foundation. LP was (partially) supported by funding of the Italian Ministry of Health (ricerca corrente). AC is funded by fellowships from the Amsterdam Movement Sciences research institute. Publisher Copyright: © 2021, The Author(s).

PY - 2021/9/27

Y1 - 2021/9/27

N2 - Purpose: To assess the psychometric properties of the Dutch-Flemish Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Scale v1.2 – Global Health (PROMIS-GH). Methods: The PROMIS-GH (also referred to as PROMIS-10) was administered to 4370 persons from the Dutch general population. Unidimensionality (CFI ≥ 0.95; TLI ≥ 0.95; RMSEA ≤ 0.06; SRMR ≤ 0.08), local independence (residual correlations < 0.20), monotonicity (H > 0.30), model fit with the Graded Response Model (GRM, p < 0.001), internal consistency (alpha > 0.75), precision (total score information across the latent trait), measurement invariance (no Differential Item Functioning [DIF]), and cross-cultural validity (no DIF for language, Dutch vs. United States English) of its subscales, composed of four items each, Global Mental Health (GMH) and Global Physical Health (GPH), were assessed. Results: Confirmatory factor analyses, on both subscales, revealed slight departures from unidimensionality for GMH (CFI = 0.98; TLI = 0.95, RMSEA = 0.22; SRMR = 0.04) and GPH (CFI = 0.99; TLI = 0.97; RMSEA = 0.12; SRMR = 0.03). Local independence, monotonicity, GRM model fit, internal consistency, precision and cross-cultural validity were supported. However, Global10 (emotional problems) showed misfit on the GMH subscale, while Global08 (fatigue) presented DIF for age. Conclusion: The psychometric properties of the PROMIS-GH in the Dutch population were considered acceptable. Sufficient local independence, monotonicity, GRM fit, internal consistency, measurement invariance and cross-cultural validity were found. If future studies find similar results, structural validity of the GMH could be enhanced by improving or replacing Global10 (emotional problems).

AB - Purpose: To assess the psychometric properties of the Dutch-Flemish Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Scale v1.2 – Global Health (PROMIS-GH). Methods: The PROMIS-GH (also referred to as PROMIS-10) was administered to 4370 persons from the Dutch general population. Unidimensionality (CFI ≥ 0.95; TLI ≥ 0.95; RMSEA ≤ 0.06; SRMR ≤ 0.08), local independence (residual correlations < 0.20), monotonicity (H > 0.30), model fit with the Graded Response Model (GRM, p < 0.001), internal consistency (alpha > 0.75), precision (total score information across the latent trait), measurement invariance (no Differential Item Functioning [DIF]), and cross-cultural validity (no DIF for language, Dutch vs. United States English) of its subscales, composed of four items each, Global Mental Health (GMH) and Global Physical Health (GPH), were assessed. Results: Confirmatory factor analyses, on both subscales, revealed slight departures from unidimensionality for GMH (CFI = 0.98; TLI = 0.95, RMSEA = 0.22; SRMR = 0.04) and GPH (CFI = 0.99; TLI = 0.97; RMSEA = 0.12; SRMR = 0.03). Local independence, monotonicity, GRM model fit, internal consistency, precision and cross-cultural validity were supported. However, Global10 (emotional problems) showed misfit on the GMH subscale, while Global08 (fatigue) presented DIF for age. Conclusion: The psychometric properties of the PROMIS-GH in the Dutch population were considered acceptable. Sufficient local independence, monotonicity, GRM fit, internal consistency, measurement invariance and cross-cultural validity were found. If future studies find similar results, structural validity of the GMH could be enhanced by improving or replacing Global10 (emotional problems).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85115831288&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s12955-021-01855-0

DO - 10.1186/s12955-021-01855-0

M3 - Article

C2 - 34579721

AN - SCOPUS:85115831288

SN - 1477-7525

VL - 19

JO - Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

JF - Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

IS - 1

M1 - 226

ER -

Psychometric properties of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system scale v1.2: global health (PROMIS-GH) in a Dutch general population

Abstract

Bibliographical note

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this