Abstract
This article explores the determinants of confidence in the Turkish government. We question whether confidence-related questions in mass surveys tap specific support for the incumbent government or tap diffuse support for government as a democratic institution. For this purpose, sociocultural, performance, and party explanations are tested. Four waves of the World Values Survey for Turkey are used as the data set. The article finds that performance and party-based explanations are the most relevant. Turkish citizens place greater emphasis on 'government as the incumbent' rather than on 'government as a democratic institution'. The analysis also reveals the changing influences of both performance and party-based explanations across time, which points to the significance of context. Through a cross-country analysis, the viability of the findings in the Turkish case are evaluated against those of other developing democracies.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 230-250 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | International Political Science Review |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Mar 2012 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Acknowledgments:The doctoral studies of Aylin Aydın and Cerem I. Cenker are supported by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK). Both appreciate TUBITAK’s support. The authors also wish to thank Ass. Prof. Işık Özel, Prof. Dr. Sabri Sayarı, Prof. Dr. Ali Çarkoğlu, Prof. Dr. Ersin Kalaycıoğlu, Gözde Yavuz, and three anonymous reviewers for their critical comments and insights.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Public confidence in government: Empirical implications from a developing democracy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver