Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Quality of life in patients with CRB1-associated retinal dystrophies: A longitudinal study

  • Jessica S. Karuntu
  • , Xuan Thanh An Nguyen
  • , Mays Talib
  • , Mary J. van Schooneveld
  • , Jan Wijnholds
  • , Maria M. van Genderen
  • , Nicoline E. Schalij-Delfos
  • , Caroline C.W. Klaver
  • , Magda A. Meester-Smoor
  • , L. Ingeborgh van den Born
  • , Carel B. Hoyng
  • , Alberta A.H.J. Thiadens
  • , Arthur A. Bergen
  • , Ruth M.A. van Nispen
  • , Camiel J.F. Boon*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Leiden University Medical Centre
  • Amsterdam UMC
  • Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience
  • Bartiméus : Diagnostic Centre for Complex Visual Disorders
  • Utrecht University
  • The Rotterdam Eye Hospital
  • Radboud University Medical Center
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
  • Institute of Molecular and Clinical Ophthalmology

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)
98 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the longitudinal vision-related quality of life among patients with CRB1-associated inherited retinal dystrophies. Methods: In this longitudinal questionnaire study, the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (39 items, NEI VFQ-39) was applied at baseline, two-year follow-up, and 4-year follow-up in patients with pathogenic CRB1 variants. [Correction added on 20 November 2023, after first online publication: The preceding sentence has been updated in this version.] Classical test theory was performed to obtain subdomain scores and in particular ‘near activities’ and ‘total composite’ scores. The Rasch analysis based on previous calibrations of the NEI VFQ-25 was applied to create visual functioning and socio-emotional subscales. Results: In total, 22 patients with a CRB1-associated retinal dystrophy were included, […] with a median age of 25.0 years (interquartile range: 13–31 years) at baseline and mean follow-up of 4.0 ± 0.3 years. [Correction added on 20 November 2023, after first online publication: The preceding sentence has been updated in this version.] A significant decline at 4 years was observed for ‘near activities’ (51.0 ± 23.8 vs 35.4 ± 14.7, p = 0.004) and ‘total composite’ (63.0 ± 13.1 vs 52.0 ± 12.1, p = 0.001) subdomain scores. For the Rasch-scaled scores, the ‘visual functioning’ scale significantly decreased after 2 years (−0.89 logits; p = 0.012), but not at 4-year follow-up (+0.01 logits; p = 0.975). [Correction added on 20 November 2023, after first online publication: In the preceding sentence, “…after 4 years…” has been corrected to “…after 2 years…” in this version.] The ‘socio-emotional’ scale also showed a significant decline after 2 years (−0.78 logits, p = 0.033) and 4 years (−0.83 logits, p = 0.021). Conclusion: In the absence of an intervention, a decline in vision-related quality of life is present in patients with pathogenic CRB1 variants at 4-year follow-up. Patient-reported outcome measures should be included in future clinical trials, as they can be a potential indicator of disease progression and treatment efficacy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)469-477
Number of pages9
JournalActa Ophthalmologica
Volume102
Issue number4
Early online date25 Sept 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2024

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This research was supported by UitZicht (specifically by Algemene Nederlandse Vereniging ter Voorkoming van Blindheid (ANVVB), Landelijke Stichting voor Blinden en Slechtzienden (LSBS), and the Oogfonds), Curing Retinal Blindness Foundation, Stichting Blindenhulp, Bontius Stichting, and Retina Fonds. Their contribution did not affect study design or research conduct.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors. Acta Ophthalmologica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Quality of life in patients with CRB1-associated retinal dystrophies: A longitudinal study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this