Abstract
PURPOSE: This study is the first to evaluate the prevalence of retinal thinning and the correlation with papilledema and visual acuity (VA) in a large population with craniosynostosis. DESIGN: Prospective clinical cohort study. METHODS: All and complex patients syndromic and complex with craniosynostosis who visited the only national referral center between 2018 and 2020 were included. Retinal layers were segmented using optical coherence tomography. Patients were seen by an ophthalmologist for VA assessment and fundoscopy. Multivariate regression models were developed to evaluate correlations between retinal thickness, papilledema and VA. RESULTS: We included 127 patients. Retinal thinning was most prevalent in the peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (≤38%). A longer duration of papilledema in early childhood correlated with an increased peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer and total retinal thickness optic nerve head later in life (+0.3 ± 0.2, P = .04 and +1.0 ± 1.0, P = .003); however, its thickness was not correlated with the VA (P = .20 and P = .53). Macular retinal thinning was associated with a worse VA (P = .01); however, it was not correlated with the duration of papilledema (P = .95). CONCLUSIONS: Following a preventative treatment strategy for syndromic and complex craniosynostosis, the prevalence of retinal ONH thinning is low. Although the prevalence of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thinning is considerable, its thickness is not correlated with VA. In contrast, macular thinning is correlated with worse VA scores and should, therefore, be evaluated during follow-up. Future studies should evaluate the (1) causative mechanism for macular thinning, (2) correlation between the time to surgery and macular thinning, and (3) results of reactive treatment strategies and compare those results to the current study.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 38-45 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | American Journal of Ophthalmology |
Volume | 235 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Mar 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:All authors attest that they meet the current ICMJE criteria for authorship. Funding/Support: This study was funded by the foundation ?Stichting Lijf en Leven? (Krimpen aan de IJssel, the Netherlands, Grant no. 16-155). Financial disclosures: No financial disclosures. Acknowledgements: The authors thank Dr. A.T. Wilson for revising the manuscript as a native scientific writer. The authors thank ?Stichting Lijf en Leven? for their financial contribution, which has made this work possible. Approval and consent: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Erasmus MC (MEC-2005-273 and 2017-1143).
Funding Information:
Funding/Support: This study was funded by the foundation ‘Stichting Lijf en Leven’ (Krimpen aan de IJssel, the Netherlands, Grant no. 16-155). Financial disclosures: No financial disclosures. Acknowledgements: The authors thank Dr. A.T. Wilson for revising the manuscript as a native scientific writer. The authors thank ‘Stichting Lijf en Leven’ for their financial contribution, which has made this work possible. Approval and consent: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Erasmus MC (MEC-2005-273 and 2017-1143).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors