Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Quantifying the Effect of Methotrexate on Adalimumab Response in Psoriasis by Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Modeling: When the rhetoric of sharing can backfire

  • Astrid van Huizen*
  • , Paul Bank
  • , Gayle van der Kraaij
  • , Annelie Musters
  • , Celine Busard
  • , Stef Menting
  • , Theo Rispens
  • , Annick de Vries
  • , Martijn van Doorn
  • , Errol Prens
  • , Jo Lambert
  • , Juul van den Reek
  • , Elke de Jong
  • , Ron Mathôt
  • , Phyllis Spuls
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute
  • Amsterdam UMC
  • Northwest Clinics
  • Northwest Clinics Alkmaar
  • Rode Kruis Ziekenhuis
  • University of Amsterdam
  • Sanquin Blood Supply Foundation
  • Ghent University Hospital
  • Radboud University Medical Center
  • Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis
  • Center for Human Drug Research

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)
108 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Previously, we showed that the combination of methotrexate and adalimumab treatment leads to less antidrug antibody development. In this study, we quantify the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) of adalimumab and evaluate the influence of methotrexate cotreatment. A population PK–PD model was developed using prospective data from 59 patients with psoriasis (baseline PASI = 12.6) receiving adalimumab over 49 weeks. Typical PK and PD parameters and their corresponding interpatient variability were estimated. We performed a covariate analysis to assess whether interpatient variability could be explained by addition of methotrexate and other covariates. In total, 330 PASIs, 252 adalimumab serum concentrations, and 247 antidrug antibody titers were available. Presence of antidrug antibodies (adalimumab group = 46.7%, adalimumab + methotrexate group = 38.7%; P = .031) was correlated with increased adalimumab apparent clearance (P < .001). In the PD model, the use of concomitant methotrexate was borderline to significantly correlated with a decreased half-maximal inhibitory concentration (adalimumab concentration for which clinical response score is reduced by half; P < .10). On the basis of our PK–PD model, concomitant use of methotrexate indirectly increases adalimumab concentration, partially through less antidrug antibodies formation, which may result in better efficacy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)794-801.e6
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Investigative Dermatology
Volume144
Issue number4
Early online date20 Nov 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors

Acknowledgments:
We thank Wouter Ouwerkerk for his contribution to the original OPTIMAP study in which the data for this pharmacokinetics–pharmacodynamics model were collected. Conceptualization: AvH, PB, RM; Data Curation: AvH, PB, GvdK, AM, CB, SM, JvdR; Formal Analysis: PB; Investigation: AvH, PB; Methodology: PB, RM; Project Administration: AvH; Resources: RM, PS; Supervision: RM, PS; Validation: PB, RM; Visualization: AvH, PB; Writing – Original Draft Preparation: AvH, PB; Writing – Review and Editing: GvdK, AM, CB, SM, TR, AdV, MvD, EP, JL, JvdR, EdJ, RM, PS

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Quantifying the Effect of Methotrexate on Adalimumab Response in Psoriasis by Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Modeling: When the rhetoric of sharing can backfire'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this