TY - JOUR
T1 - Quo Vadis HTA for Medical Devices in Central and Eastern Europe?
T2 - Recommendations to Address Methodological Challenges
AU - Daubner-Bendes, Rita
AU - Kovács, Sándor
AU - Niewada, Maciej
AU - Huic, Mirjana
AU - Drummond, Michael
AU - Ciani, Oriana
AU - Blankart, Carl Rudolf
AU - Mandrik, Olena
AU - Torbica, Aleksandra
AU - Yfantopoulos, John
AU - Petrova, Guenka
AU - Holownia-Voloskova, Malwina
AU - Taylor, Rod S.
AU - Al, Maiwenn
AU - Piniazhko, Oresta
AU - Lorenzovici, László
AU - Tarricone, Rosanna
AU - Zemplényi, Antal
AU - Kaló, Zoltán
N1 - Funding Information:
This project received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Grant Agreement #779306 (COMED—Pushing the Boundaries of Cost and Outcome Analysis of Medical Technologies). The results reflect only the authors’ views, and the EU is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains.
Funding Information:
Development and improvement of HTA methodologies is on the top agenda of the European Union (EU). The EU addressed the topic in several large scale projects financed through 7th Framework and the Horizon 2020 Research Programmes: the MedtechHTA project (3) was financed through 7th Framework Research Program, and the ongoing COMED project is financed through the Horizon 2020 Program. The COMED (Pushing the boundaries of Cost and Outcome analysis of Medical Technologies) project has multiple objectives. First, it aims to improve methods for economic evaluation for medical devices by addressing most relevant challenges in HTA of medical devices, second, to investigate health system performance through analysis of variation in access to medical technologies across different geographical areas; and finally, to strengthen the use of economic evaluation of MDs in policy making (4).
Funding Information:
Contribution of Kagan Atikeler, Dragana Atanasijevic, Veronika D?czy, Ram?na Hegyi, Rok Hren, Maria Kamusheva, Katarzyna Kolasa, Olga L?blova, Gergo Mer?sz, Nuriya Musina, Vitaly Omelyanovskiy, Piotr Ozieranski, T?nde P?ter, Benedetta Pongiglione, Cristina Rais, Bernardette Rossi, Andrea Sz?kely, Tomas Tesar, ?ron Vincziczki, Vladimir Zah during the online validation meetings is gratefully acknowledged. Funding. This project received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Grant Agreement #779306 (COMED?Pushing the Boundaries of Cost and Outcome Analysis of Medical Technologies). The results reflect only the authors' views, and the EU is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains.
Publisher Copyright:
© Copyright © 2021 Daubner-Bendes, Kovács, Niewada, Huic, Drummond, Ciani, Blankart, Mandrik, Torbica, Yfantopoulos, Petrova, Holownia-Voloskova, Taylor, Al, Piniazhko, Lorenzovici, Tarricone, Zemplényi and Kaló.
PY - 2021/1/8
Y1 - 2021/1/8
N2 - Objectives: Methodological challenges in the evaluation of medical devices (MDs) may be different for early and late technology adopter countries, as well as the potential health technology assessment (HTA) solutions to tackle them. This study aims to provide guidance to Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries on how to address key challenges of HTA for MDs with special focus on the transferability of scientific evidence. Methods: As part of the COMED Horizon 2020 project, a comprehensive list of issues related to MD HTA were identified based on a targeted literature review. Health technology assessment issues which pose a greater challenge or require different solutions in late technology adopter countries were selected. Draught recommendations to address these issues were developed and discussed in a focus group. The recommendations were then validated with a wider group of experts, including HTA and reimbursement decision makers from CEE countries in May and June 2020. Results: A consolidated list of 11 recommendations were developed in 3 major areas: (1) clinical value assessment, focusing on the use of joint EU work, relying on real-world evidence, use of coverage with evidence development schemes, transferring evidence from foreign countries and addressing the challenges of learning curve and centre effect; (2) economic value assessment, covering cost calculation of complex medical devices and transferability of economic evaluations of MDs; (3) HTA processes, related to the frequent product modifications and various indications of MDs. Conclusions: Central and Eastern European countries with limited resources for conducting HTA, can benefit from HTA methods and evidence generated in early technology adopter countries. Considering the appropriate reuse of international HTA materials, late technology adopter countries can still implement HTA, even for MDs, which have a more limited evidence base compared with pharmaceuticals.
AB - Objectives: Methodological challenges in the evaluation of medical devices (MDs) may be different for early and late technology adopter countries, as well as the potential health technology assessment (HTA) solutions to tackle them. This study aims to provide guidance to Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries on how to address key challenges of HTA for MDs with special focus on the transferability of scientific evidence. Methods: As part of the COMED Horizon 2020 project, a comprehensive list of issues related to MD HTA were identified based on a targeted literature review. Health technology assessment issues which pose a greater challenge or require different solutions in late technology adopter countries were selected. Draught recommendations to address these issues were developed and discussed in a focus group. The recommendations were then validated with a wider group of experts, including HTA and reimbursement decision makers from CEE countries in May and June 2020. Results: A consolidated list of 11 recommendations were developed in 3 major areas: (1) clinical value assessment, focusing on the use of joint EU work, relying on real-world evidence, use of coverage with evidence development schemes, transferring evidence from foreign countries and addressing the challenges of learning curve and centre effect; (2) economic value assessment, covering cost calculation of complex medical devices and transferability of economic evaluations of MDs; (3) HTA processes, related to the frequent product modifications and various indications of MDs. Conclusions: Central and Eastern European countries with limited resources for conducting HTA, can benefit from HTA methods and evidence generated in early technology adopter countries. Considering the appropriate reuse of international HTA materials, late technology adopter countries can still implement HTA, even for MDs, which have a more limited evidence base compared with pharmaceuticals.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85099764042&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fpubh.2020.612410
DO - 10.3389/fpubh.2020.612410
M3 - Article
C2 - 33490024
AN - SCOPUS:85099764042
VL - 8
JO - Frontiers in Public Health
JF - Frontiers in Public Health
SN - 2296-2565
M1 - 612410
ER -