TY - JOUR
T1 - Radiotherapy combined with nivolumab or temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma with unmethylated MGMT promoter
T2 - An international randomized phase III trial
AU - Omuro, Antonio
AU - Brandes, Alba A.
AU - Carpentier, Antoine F.
AU - Idbaih, Ahmed
AU - Reardon, David A.
AU - Cloughesy, Timothy
AU - Sumrall, Ashley
AU - Baehring, Joachim
AU - van den Bent, Martin
AU - Bähr, Oliver
AU - Lombardi, Giuseppe
AU - Mulholland, Paul
AU - Tabatabai, Ghazaleh
AU - Lassen, Ulrik
AU - Sepulveda, Juan Manuel
AU - Khasraw, Mustafa
AU - Vauleon, Elodie
AU - Muragaki, Yoshihiro
AU - Di Giacomo, Anna Maria
AU - Butowski, Nicholas
AU - Roth, Patrick
AU - Qian, Xiaozhong
AU - Fu, Alex Z.
AU - Liu, Yanfang
AU - Potter, Von
AU - Chalamandaris, Alexandros Georgios
AU - Tatsuoka, Kay
AU - Lim, Michael
AU - Weller, Michael
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2022.
PY - 2023/1/1
Y1 - 2023/1/1
N2 - Background. Addition of temozolomide (TMZ) to radiotherapy (RT) improves overall survival (OS) in patients with glioblastoma (GBM), but previous studies suggest that patients with tumors harboring an unmethylated MGMT promoter derive minimal benefit.The aim of this open-label, phase III CheckMate 498 study was to evaluate the efficacy of nivolumab (NIVO) + RT compared withTMZ + RT in newly diagnosed GBM with unmethylated MGMT promoter. Methods. Patients were randomized 1:1 to standard RT (60 Gy) + NIVO (240 mg every 2 weeks for eight cycles, then 480 mg every 4 weeks) or RT +TMZ (75 mg/m
2 daily during RT and 150–200 mg/m
2/day 5/28 days during maintenance).The primary endpoint was OS. Results. A total of 560 patients were randomized, 280 to each arm. Median OS (mOS) was 13.4 months (95% CI, 12.6 to 14.3) with NIVO + RT and 14.9 months (95% CI, 13.3 to 16.1) withTMZ + RT (hazard ratio [HR], 1.31; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.58; P = .0037). Median progression-free survival was 6.0 months (95% CI, 5.7 to 6.2) with NIVO + RT and 6.2 months (95% CI, 5.9 to 6.7) withTMZ + RT (HR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.15 to 1.65). Response rates were 7.8% (9/116) with NIVO + RT and 7.2% (8/111) withTMZ + RT; grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) rates were 21.9% and 25.1%, and any-grade seriousTRAE rates were 17.3% and 7.6%, respectively. Conclusions. The study did not meet the primary endpoint of improved OS; TMZ + RT demonstrated a longer mOS than NIVO + RT. No new safety signals were detected with NIVO in this study. The difference between the study treatment arms is consistent with the use ofTMZ + RT as the standard of care for GBM.
AB - Background. Addition of temozolomide (TMZ) to radiotherapy (RT) improves overall survival (OS) in patients with glioblastoma (GBM), but previous studies suggest that patients with tumors harboring an unmethylated MGMT promoter derive minimal benefit.The aim of this open-label, phase III CheckMate 498 study was to evaluate the efficacy of nivolumab (NIVO) + RT compared withTMZ + RT in newly diagnosed GBM with unmethylated MGMT promoter. Methods. Patients were randomized 1:1 to standard RT (60 Gy) + NIVO (240 mg every 2 weeks for eight cycles, then 480 mg every 4 weeks) or RT +TMZ (75 mg/m
2 daily during RT and 150–200 mg/m
2/day 5/28 days during maintenance).The primary endpoint was OS. Results. A total of 560 patients were randomized, 280 to each arm. Median OS (mOS) was 13.4 months (95% CI, 12.6 to 14.3) with NIVO + RT and 14.9 months (95% CI, 13.3 to 16.1) withTMZ + RT (hazard ratio [HR], 1.31; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.58; P = .0037). Median progression-free survival was 6.0 months (95% CI, 5.7 to 6.2) with NIVO + RT and 6.2 months (95% CI, 5.9 to 6.7) withTMZ + RT (HR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.15 to 1.65). Response rates were 7.8% (9/116) with NIVO + RT and 7.2% (8/111) withTMZ + RT; grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) rates were 21.9% and 25.1%, and any-grade seriousTRAE rates were 17.3% and 7.6%, respectively. Conclusions. The study did not meet the primary endpoint of improved OS; TMZ + RT demonstrated a longer mOS than NIVO + RT. No new safety signals were detected with NIVO in this study. The difference between the study treatment arms is consistent with the use ofTMZ + RT as the standard of care for GBM.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85145955703&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/neuonc/noac099
DO - 10.1093/neuonc/noac099
M3 - Article
C2 - 35419607
AN - SCOPUS:85145955703
SN - 1522-8517
VL - 25
SP - 123
EP - 134
JO - Neuro-Oncology
JF - Neuro-Oncology
IS - 1
ER -