Raising the Bar: the Development of Docket Control on the Court of Justice

Arthur Dyevre, Monika Glavina, Michal Ovadek

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

15 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We examine the emergence and evolution of docket control mechanisms in the preliminary ruling procedure. Using both legal and statistical analysis, we show that reasoned orders have increased dramatically since the mid-1990s, with courts in Italy and Central and Eastern member states being the most frequent targets. We argue that the trajectory of the European Court of Justice’s docket policy is an indirect manifestation of its ascendant position as Europe’s judicial powerhouse. Facing a rising caseload, the Court has sought to optimise the allocation of its resources by applying stricter admissibility criteria and by prioritising references raising novel legal issues. For domestic courts, this evolution means that references must satisfy higher standards of quality and originality, although the application of these standards is itself influenced by the size of the Court’s backlog at the time of submission
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)523-548
JournalAustrian Journal of Public Law (Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht), (2021)
Volume76
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2021
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Raising the Bar: the Development of Docket Control on the Court of Justice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this