Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Reaching beyond maximum grade: progress and future directions for modernising the assessment and reporting of adverse events in haematological malignancies

  • Gita Thanarajasingam*
  • , Lori M. Minasian
  • , Vishal Bhatnagar
  • , Franco Cavalli
  • , R. Angelo De Claro
  • , Amylou C. Dueck
  • , Tarec C. El-Galaly
  • , Neil Everest
  • , Jan Geissler
  • , Christian Gisselbrecht
  • , Nicole Gormley
  • , John Gribben
  • , Mary Horowitz
  • , S. Percy Ivy
  • , Caron A. Jacobson
  • , Armand Keating
  • , Paul G. Kluetz
  • , Yok Lam Kwong
  • , Richard F. Little
  • , Matthew J. Matasar
  • Maria Victoria Mateos, Kristen McCullough, Robert S. Miller, Mohamad Mohty, Philippe Moreau, Lindsay M. Morton, Sumimasa Nagai, Abhilasha Nair, Loretta Nastoupil, Kaye Robertson, Surbhi Sidana, Karin E. Smedby, Pieter Sonneveld, Kyriaki Tzogani, Flora E. van Leeuwen, Galina Velikova, Diego Villa, John R. Wingard, John F. Seymour, Thomas M. Habermann
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN
  • National Cancer Institute (Bethesda, Md)
  • United States Food and Drug Administration
  • Institute of Oncology of Southern Switzerland
  • Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
  • Aalborg University Hospital
  • Leukaemia Patient Advocates Foundation
  • Hospital St. Louis
  • European Medicines Agency
  • Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry
  • Medical College of Wisconsin
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
  • The University of Hong Kong
  • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
  • Hospital Clínico Universitario de Salamanca
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology
  • Sorbonne Université
  • CHU de Nantes
  • Kyoto University
  • Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency
  • University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
  • Therapeutic Goods Administration
  • Stanford University School of Medicine
  • Karolinska Institutet
  • Karolinska University Hospital
  • Netherlands Cancer Institute
  • University of Leeds, School of Medicine
  • University of British Columbia
  • University of Florida College of Medicine
  • Peter Maccallum Cancer Centre
  • Royal Melbourne Hospital
  • University of Melbourne
  • Australian Government Department of Health
  • Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Centre
  • British Columbia Cancer Research Institute

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Remarkable improvements in outcomes for many haematological malignancies have been driven primarily by a proliferation of novel therapeutics over the past two decades. Targeted agents, immune and cellular therapies, and combination regimens have adverse event profiles distinct from conventional finite cytotoxic chemotherapies. In 2018, a Commission comprising patient advocates, clinicians, clinical investigators, regulators, biostatisticians, and pharmacists representing a broad range of academic and clinical cancer expertise examined issues of adverse event evaluation in the context of both newer and existing therapies for haematological cancers. The Commission proposed immediate actions and long-term solutions in the current processes in adverse event assessment, patient-reported outcomes in haematological malignancies, toxicities in cellular therapies, long-term toxicity and survivorship in haematological malignancies, issues in regulatory approval from an international perspective, and toxicity reporting in haematological malignancies and the real-world setting. In this follow-up report, the Commission describes progress that has been made in these areas since the initial report.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e374-e384
JournalThe Lancet Haematology
Volume9
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright: © 2022 Elsevier Ltd

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reaching beyond maximum grade: progress and future directions for modernising the assessment and reporting of adverse events in haematological malignancies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this