Realized semibetas: Disentangling “good” and “bad” downside risks

Tim Bollerslev*, Andrew J. Patton, Rogier Quaedvlieg

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
22 Downloads (Pure)


We propose a new decomposition of the traditional market beta into four semibetas that depend on the signed covariation between the market and individual asset returns. We show that semibetas stemming from negative market and negative asset return covariation predict significantly higher future returns, while semibetas attributable to negative market and positive asset return covariation predict significantly lower future returns. The two semibetas associated with positive market return variation do not appear to be priced. The results are consistent with the pricing implications from a mean-semivariance framework combined with arbitrage risk driving a wedge between the risk premiums for long and short positions. We conclude that rather than betting against the traditional market beta, it is better to bet on and against the “right” semibetas.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)227-246
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Financial Economics
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2021

Bibliographical note

JEL classification: G11, G12, C58
Funding Information:
We thank our referee, Hugues Langlois (discussant) and Jia Li for many useful comments, as well as participants at several conferences and university seminars. Patton and Quaedvlieg gratefully acknowledge support from, respectively, Australian Research Council Discovery Project 180104120 and Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research Grant 451-17-009. A previous version of this work circulated under the title “Realized Semibetas: Signs of Things to Come.”

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021


Dive into the research topics of 'Realized semibetas: Disentangling “good” and “bad” downside risks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this