Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Rechallenge of ipilimumab and nivolumab in advanced melanoma patients after previous ipilimumab-based therapy

  • E. J. van Dijk*
  • , H. H. Nienhuis
  • , A. J.M. van den Eertwegh
  • , M. J. Boers-Sonderen
  • , M. Bloem
  • , A. M. Kamphuis
  • , M. M. Ros
  • , C. Bos
  • , M. J.B. Aarts
  • , F. W.P.J. van den Berkmortel
  • , C. U. Blank
  • , W. A.M. Blokx
  • , J. W.B. de Groot
  • , G. A.P. Hospers
  • , D. Piersma
  • , R. S. van Rijn
  • , A. M. Stevense-den Boer
  • , G. Vreugdenhil
  • , M. W.J.M. Wouters
  • , E. Kapiteijn
  • J. B. Haanen, A. A.M. van der Veldt, K. P.M. Suijkerbuijk
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Utrecht University
  • Hartwig Medical Foundation
  • Radboud University Medical Center
  • Zuyderland Medical Center (Heerlen)
  • Netherlands Cancer Institute
  • Leiden University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Ipilimumab+nivolumab (IPINIVO) can induce durable responses in advanced melanoma, but many patients experience progression at some point. It is currently unknown to what extent these patients benefit from IPINIVO rechallenge. This study describes efficacy and safety of IPINIVO rechallenge. Methods: Data from advanced melanoma patients rechallenged with IPINIVO after previous ipilimumab-containing treatment were retrieved from the nationwide Dutch Melanoma Treatment Registry. Patient characteristics, responses, survival, and safety were analyzed. Results: Among 3.759 patients receiving ipilimumab-containing treatment, 73 received rechallenge IPINIVO. 41 received IPINIVO, 32 ipilimumab monotherapy (IPI) as initial therapy. Objective response to rechallenge IPINIVO was seen in 36.1% (initial IPINIVO) and 40.0% (initial IPI) of patients. Median progression-free survival after rechallenge was 2.8 months (initial IPINIVO) and 5.6 months (initial IPI), but reached 18.4 months for responders to rechallenge therapy. Grade ≥3 immune-related adverse events occurred in 40.5% (initial IPINIVO) and 38.7% (initial IPI) of patients. Objective responses to initial and rechallenge treatment were discordant in 48.6% (initial IPINIVO) and 53.3% (initial IPI) of patients. Fifteen patients (20.5%) responded to rechallenge therapy but not to initial treatment. Conclusions: Rechallenge IPINIVO after previous ipilimumab-based therapy had a considerable response rate, acceptable safety profile, and potential for a durable response.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)66-75
Number of pages10
JournalBritish Journal of Cancer
Volume133
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 27 Jul 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited 2025.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Rechallenge of ipilimumab and nivolumab in advanced melanoma patients after previous ipilimumab-based therapy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this