Recognition of the pattern of complex fractures of the elbow using 3D-printed models

Huub H. de Klerk*, Jacobien H.F. Oosterhoff, Traumaplatform 3D Consortium, Bram Schoolmeesters, Patrick Nieboer, Denise Eygendaal, Ruurd L. Jaarsma, Frank F.A. IJpma, Michel P.J. van den Bekerom, Job N. Doornberg

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review


AIMS: This study aimed to answer the following questions: do 3D-printed models lead to a more accurate recognition of the pattern of complex fractures of the elbow?; do 3D-printed models lead to a more reliable recognition of the pattern of these injuries?; and do junior surgeons benefit more from 3D-printed models than senior surgeons? METHODS: A total of 15 orthopaedic trauma surgeons (seven juniors, eight seniors) evaluated 20 complex elbow fractures for their overall pattern (i.e. varus posterior medial rotational injury, terrible triad injury, radial head fracture with posterolateral dislocation, anterior (trans-)olecranon fracture-dislocation, posterior (trans-)olecranon fracture-dislocation) and their specific characteristics. First, fractures were assessed based on radiographs and 2D and 3D CT scans; and in a subsequent round, one month later, with additional 3D-printed models. Diagnostic accuracy (acc) and inter-surgeon reliability (κ) were determined for each assessment. RESULTS: Accuracy significantly improved with 3D-printed models for the whole group on pattern recognition (acc2D/3D = 0.62 vs acc3Dprint= 0.69; Δacc = 0.07 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.00 to 0.14); p = 0.025). A significant improvement was also seen in reliability for pattern recognition with the additional 3D-printed models (κ2D/3D = 0.41 (moderate) vs κ3Dprint = 0.59 (moderate); Δκ = 0.18 (95% CI 0.14 to 0.22); p ≤ 0.001). Accuracy was comparable between junior and senior surgeons with the 3D-printed model (accjunior = 0.70 vs accsenior = 0.68; Δacc = -0.02 (95% CI -0.17 to 0.13); p = 0.904). Reliability was also comparable between junior and senior surgeons without the 3D-printed model (κjunior = 0.39 (fair) vs κsenior = 0.43 (moderate); Δκ = 0.03 (95% CI -0.03 to 0.10); p = 0.318). However, junior surgeons showed greater improvement regarding reliability than seniors with 3D-printed models (κjunior = 0.65 (substantial) vs κsenior = 0.54 (moderate); Δκ = 0.11 (95% CI 0.04 to 0.18); p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: The use of 3D-printed models significantly improved the accuracy and reliability of recognizing the pattern of complex fractures of the elbow. However, the current long printing time and non-reusable materials could limit the usefulness of 3D-printed models in clinical practice. They could be suitable as a reusable tool for teaching residents.Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(1):56-63.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)56-63
Number of pages8
JournalThe bone & joint journal
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2023

Bibliographical note

Funding statement:
The authors disclose receipt of the following financial or material support
for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: personal
travel grants from De Stichting Prof. Michaël-van Vloten Fonds, the
Stichting het Scholten-Cordes Fonds, and the USC Scholarship Foundation.


Dive into the research topics of 'Recognition of the pattern of complex fractures of the elbow using 3D-printed models'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this