Reconstruction of the Aortic Arch in Neonates and Infants: The Importance of Patch Material

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)
23 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objectives:
Restenosis after aortic arch reconstruction is a known complication in neonates and infants. Homograft is the most commonly used patch material for aortic arch reconstructions in our center. Since 2014, tissue-engineered bovine pericardium (CardioCel) has been used as an alternative. The aim of our study was to determine whether the choice of material affected the development of restenosis in these patients.

Methods:
Data of all neonates and infants who underwent aortic arch reconstruction with the use of any patch material between 2005 and 2016 were analyzed. Restenosis was defined by the need for reintervention, either percutaneous or surgical.

Results:
Forty-one patients underwent aortic arch repair. Excluding the 30-day mortality, 36 patients represented the study population. At primary repair, the aortic arch was reconstructed with homograft (n = 26) or CardioCel (n = 10). Restenosis was documented during the first year of life in 13 patients: Six (23%) patients in the homograft group and seven (70%) patients in the CardioCel group (P = .01). In the homograft group, the median time from operation to first intervention for restenosis was 22.0 (range: 14-32) weeks, as compared to 14.0 (range: 7-21) weeks in the CardioCel group (P = .04).

Conclusion:
We conclude that choice of patch material is likely to be an important determinant for the risk of restenosis needing reintervention following reconstruction of the aortic arch in neonates and infants.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)487-491
JournalWorld Journal for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery
Volume12
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 Jul 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reconstruction of the Aortic Arch in Neonates and Infants: The Importance of Patch Material'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this