Recurrence of breast cancer after reconstruction with macro-textured silicone breast implants: a retrospective cohort study

Jonathan Spoor, Frederike Dieleman, Eveline M.A. Bleiker, Linetta Koppert, Marie-Jeanne T.F.D. Vrancken Peeters, Flora E. Van Leeuwen, Marc Mureau*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Recently, old concerns linking silicone breast implants (SBIs) with breast cancer have resurfaced. These concerns apply specifically to the risk of breast cancer recurrence in patients who received breast reconstructions with macro-textured SBIs. In this study, the authors investigated the effect of breast reconstruction with macro-textured SBIs on long-term oncologic outcomes of breast cancer patients.

Materials and methods: The authors conducted a retrospective cohort study in two large cancer centres in the Netherlands. Patients who had been treated for primary breast cancer between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2015 were included. Data on treatment and oncologic outcomes were obtained from prospectively maintained institutional and nationwide registries. Patient files were reviewed manually to complement missing information. Missing data were accounted for by multiple imputations by chained equations (MICE). Reconstruction with a macro-textured SBI was analysed as a time-dependent variable. The main outcomes of interest were locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using multivariable Cox proportional hazard models.

Results: Of the 4695 women who were eligible for inclusion, 2393 had undergone mastectomy. Of these women, 1187 (25%) had received breast reconstruction with a macro-textured SBI. The mean follow-up time was 11.5 (SD, 5.0) years. Compared with women who had undergone a simple mastectomy or autologous breast reconstruction, women with an implant-based reconstruction did not differ significantly in LRRFS or DMFS after accounting for various confounding factors [HR 1.27 (95% CI 0.93-1.72) and HR 0.94 (95% CI 0.74-1.20), respectively]. Sensitivity analysis in complete cases of patients and various subgroup analyses yielded similar results.

Conclusion: Reassuringly, in this multi-centre cohort study no difference was found in long-term oncologic outcomes between women who had received breast reconstruction with a macro-textured SBI and women who had undergone a simple mastectomy or autologous breast reconstruction.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)6723-6731
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Journal of Surgery
Volume110
Issue number10
Early online date26 Jun 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright: Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Recurrence of breast cancer after reconstruction with macro-textured silicone breast implants: a retrospective cohort study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this