TY - CHAP
T1 - Reframing rigor as reasoning
T2 - Challenging technocratic conceptions of rigor in management research
AU - Harley, Bill
AU - Cornelissen, Joep
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2019 by Emerald Publishing Limited.
PY - 2019/4/11
Y1 - 2019/4/11
N2 - In this chapter, the authors critique dominant technocratic conceptions of rigor in management research and elaborate an alternative account of rigor that is rooted in methodology and involves a concern with the quality of scientific reasoning rather than a narrower focus on methods or measurement issues per se. Based on the proposed redefinition, the authors conceptualize how rigor, as an essential quality of reasoning, may be defined and the authors in turn qualify alternative methodological criteria for how they might assess the rigor of any particular piece of research. In short, with this chapter the authors’ overall aim is to shift the basis of rigor to an altogether more legitimate and commensurable notion that squarely puts the focus on reasoning and scientific inference for quantitative and qualitative research alike. The authors highlight some of the benefits that such an alternative and unified view of rigor may potentially provide toward fostering the quality and progress of management research.
AB - In this chapter, the authors critique dominant technocratic conceptions of rigor in management research and elaborate an alternative account of rigor that is rooted in methodology and involves a concern with the quality of scientific reasoning rather than a narrower focus on methods or measurement issues per se. Based on the proposed redefinition, the authors conceptualize how rigor, as an essential quality of reasoning, may be defined and the authors in turn qualify alternative methodological criteria for how they might assess the rigor of any particular piece of research. In short, with this chapter the authors’ overall aim is to shift the basis of rigor to an altogether more legitimate and commensurable notion that squarely puts the focus on reasoning and scientific inference for quantitative and qualitative research alike. The authors highlight some of the benefits that such an alternative and unified view of rigor may potentially provide toward fostering the quality and progress of management research.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85063577173
U2 - 10.1108/S0733-558X20190000059004
DO - 10.1108/S0733-558X20190000059004
M3 - Chapter
AN - SCOPUS:85063577173
T3 - Research in the Sociology of Organizations
SP - 59
EP - 76
BT - Research in the Sociology of Organizations
ER -