Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Regional Versus Systematic Biopsy in Addition to Targeted Biopsy: Results from a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

  • Francesco Sanguedolce*
  • , Carol Nancy Gianna Lauwers
  • , Alessandro Tedde
  • , Giuseppe Basile
  • , EAU Section of Urological Imaging (ESUI)
  • , Daria Chernysheva
  • , Alessandro Uleri
  • , Michael Baboudjian
  • , Gianluca Giannarini
  • , Valeria Panebianco
  • , Massimo Madonia
  • , Lars Budeaus
  • , Morgan Roupret
  • , Joan Palou
  • , Alberto Breda
  • , Ivo Schoots
  • , Anwar R Padhani
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Fundacio Puigvert
  • Urological Research Institute
  • Shox International Hospital
  • North Academic Hospital
  • IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele
  • Sapienza University (Roma)
  • Dipartimento di Medicina
  • University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
  • Sorbonne Université
  • Mount Vernon Hospital

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)
65 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Intensification of targeted biopsy (TBx) around a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-visible lesion with regional biopsy (RBx) could obviate the need for systematic biopsy (SBx). We aimed to compare the detection yields of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa)-defined as International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade group ≥2-between TBx + RBx and the reference standard (TBx + SBx).

METHODS:

RBx was defined as perilesional or ipsilateral biopsy. A literature search was conducted up to September 2023 using PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. Included studies were eligible when presenting data from SBx, TBx, and TBx + RBx cores and their detection yields. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) criteria were used to assess the risk of bias of the included studies.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: 

Twenty-one studies were included for a meta-analysis. The overall detection yield of csPCa was not statistically different between TBx + SBX and TBx + RBx (46.1% vs 44.2%; odds ratio [OR] 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.99-1.16, p = 0.07); similar findings were found also for ISUP grade group ≥3 prostate cancer (PCa; OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.92-1.22, p = 0.43) and in different subgroup analyses. TBx + SBx was associated with higher cancer detection of ISUP grade group 1 PCa (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.04-1.30, p = 0.008). The main limitations include the retrospective nature of most of the selected studies, heterogeneity of RBx definition, and template.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: 

Our study supports the use of the TBx + RBx template in the early detection pathway for the detection of csPCa. SBx can be omitted when targeting lesions visible on MRI.

PATIENT SUMMARY: 

A prostate biopsy strategy consisting of taking biopsy in and around an magnetic resonance imaging-visible lesion reduces the risk of detecting indolent prostate cancers without affecting the detection of aggressive tumours.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)534-543
Number of pages10
JournalEuropean urology oncology
Volume8
Issue number2
Early online date24 Oct 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2025

Bibliographical note

Copyright © 2024 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Regional Versus Systematic Biopsy in Addition to Targeted Biopsy: Results from a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this