Replicability and robustness of GWAS for behavioral traits

  • Niels Rietveld
  • , D Conley
  • , N Eriksson
  • , T Esko
  • , SE Medland
  • , AAE Vinkhuyzen
  • , Jiaqi Yang
  • , JD Boardman
  • , CF Chabris
  • , CT Dawes
  • , BW Domingue
  • , DA Hinds
  • , M Johannesson
  • , AK Kiefer
  • , D Laibson
  • , PKE Magnusson
  • , JL Mountain
  • , S Oskarsson
  • , O Rostapshova
  • , A Teumer
  • JY Tung, PM Visscher, DJ Benjamin, D Cesarini, PD Koellinger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

81 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A recent genome-wide-association study of educational attainment identified three single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) whose associations, despite their small effect sizes (each R (2) ? 0.02%), reached genome-wide significance (p < 5 × 10(-8)) in a large discovery sample and were replicated in an independent sample (p < .05). The study also reported associations between educational attainment and indices of SNPs called "polygenic scores." In three studies, we evaluated the robustness of these findings. Study 1 showed that the associations with all three SNPs were replicated in another large (N = 34,428) independent sample. We also found that the scores remained predictive (R (2) ? 2%) in regressions with stringent controls for stratification (Study 2) and in new within-family analyses (Study 3). Our results show that large and therefore well-powered genome-wide-association studies can identify replicable genetic associations with behavioral traits. The small effect sizes of individual SNPs are likely to be a major contributing factor explaining the striking contrast between our results and the disappointing replication record of most candidate-gene studies.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1975-1986
Number of pages12
JournalPsychological Science
Volume25
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Replicability and robustness of GWAS for behavioral traits'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this