Results from a nationwide prospective registry on open surgical or endovascular repair of juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms

Gerdine C.I. von Meijenfeldt; Anna J. Alberga; Ron Balm; Anco C. Vahl; Hence J.M. Verhagen; Jan D. Blankensteijn; Clark J. Zeebregts; Maarten J. van der Laan

doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2021.06.031

Results from a nationwide prospective registry on open surgical or endovascular repair of juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms

Gerdine C.I. von Meijenfeldt^*, Anna J. Alberga, Ron Balm, Anco C. Vahl, Hence J.M. Verhagen, Jan D. Blankensteijn, Clark J. Zeebregts, Maarten J. van der Laan

^*Corresponding author for this work

Surgery

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)

26 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (JRAAAs) can be treated either with open surgical repair (OSR) including suprarenal clamping or by complex endovascular aneurysm repair (cEVAR). In this study, we present the comparison between the short-term mortality and complications of the elective JRAAA treatment modalities from a national database reflecting daily practice in The Netherlands. Methods: All patients undergoing elective JRAAA open repair or cEVAR (fenestrated EVAR or chimney EVAR) between January 2016 and December 2018 registered in the Dutch Surgical Aneurysm Audit (DSAA) were eligible for inclusion. Descriptive perioperative variables and outcomes were compared between patients treated with open surgery or endovascularly. Adjusted odds ratios for short-term outcomes were calculated by logistic regression analysis. Results: In all, 455 primary treated patients with JRAAAs could be included (258 OSR, 197 cEVAR). Younger patients and female patients were treated more often with OSR vs cEVAR (72 ± 6.1 vs 76 ± 6.0; P <.001 and 22% vs 15%; P =.047, respectively). Patients treated with OSR had significantly more major and minor complications as well as a higher chance of early mortality (OSR vs cEVAR, 45% vs 21%; P <.001; 34% vs 23%; P =.011; and 6.6% vs 2.5%; P =.046, respectively). After logistic regression with adjustment for confounders, patients who were treated with OSR showed an odds ratio of 3.64 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.25-5.89; P <.001) for major complications compared with patients treated with cEVAR, and for minor complications, the odds ratios were 2.17 (95% CI, 1.34-3.53; P =.002) higher. For early mortality, the odds ratios were 3.79 (95% CI, 1.26-11.34; P =.017) higher after OSR compared with cEVAR. Conclusions: In this study, after primary elective OSR for JRAAA, the odds for major complications, minor complications, and short-term mortality were significantly higher compared with cEVAR.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	81-89.e5
Journal	Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume	75
Issue number	1
Early online date	28 Jun 2021
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2021.06.031
Publication status	Published - Jan 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank all surgeons (in training), registrars, physician assistants, and administrative nurses who registered all the patients in the DSAA, the Dutch Surgical Aneurysm Audit group, for their time and effort.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors

Access to Document

10.1016/j.jvs.2021.06.031Licence: CC BY

Results from a nationwide prospective registry on open surgical or endovascular repair of juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysmFinal published version, 353 KBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

von Meijenfeldt, G. C. I., Alberga, A. J., Balm, R., Vahl, A. C., Verhagen, H. J. M., Blankensteijn, J. D., Zeebregts, C. J., & van der Laan, M. J. (2022). Results from a nationwide prospective registry on open surgical or endovascular repair of juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 75(1), 81-89.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2021.06.031

@article{edf71a9717d14e369c203f3997dfa7ab,

title = "Results from a nationwide prospective registry on open surgical or endovascular repair of juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms",

abstract = "Background: Juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (JRAAAs) can be treated either with open surgical repair (OSR) including suprarenal clamping or by complex endovascular aneurysm repair (cEVAR). In this study, we present the comparison between the short-term mortality and complications of the elective JRAAA treatment modalities from a national database reflecting daily practice in The Netherlands. Methods: All patients undergoing elective JRAAA open repair or cEVAR (fenestrated EVAR or chimney EVAR) between January 2016 and December 2018 registered in the Dutch Surgical Aneurysm Audit (DSAA) were eligible for inclusion. Descriptive perioperative variables and outcomes were compared between patients treated with open surgery or endovascularly. Adjusted odds ratios for short-term outcomes were calculated by logistic regression analysis. Results: In all, 455 primary treated patients with JRAAAs could be included (258 OSR, 197 cEVAR). Younger patients and female patients were treated more often with OSR vs cEVAR (72 ± 6.1 vs 76 ± 6.0; P <.001 and 22% vs 15%; P =.047, respectively). Patients treated with OSR had significantly more major and minor complications as well as a higher chance of early mortality (OSR vs cEVAR, 45% vs 21%; P <.001; 34% vs 23%; P =.011; and 6.6% vs 2.5%; P =.046, respectively). After logistic regression with adjustment for confounders, patients who were treated with OSR showed an odds ratio of 3.64 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.25-5.89; P <.001) for major complications compared with patients treated with cEVAR, and for minor complications, the odds ratios were 2.17 (95% CI, 1.34-3.53; P =.002) higher. For early mortality, the odds ratios were 3.79 (95% CI, 1.26-11.34; P =.017) higher after OSR compared with cEVAR. Conclusions: In this study, after primary elective OSR for JRAAA, the odds for major complications, minor complications, and short-term mortality were significantly higher compared with cEVAR.",

author = "{von Meijenfeldt}, {Gerdine C.I.} and Alberga, {Anna J.} and Ron Balm and Vahl, {Anco C.} and Verhagen, {Hence J.M.} and Blankensteijn, {Jan D.} and Zeebregts, {Clark J.} and {van der Laan}, {Maarten J.}",

note = "Funding Information: The authors would like to thank all surgeons (in training), registrars, physician assistants, and administrative nurses who registered all the patients in the DSAA, the Dutch Surgical Aneurysm Audit group, for their time and effort. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 The Authors",

year = "2022",

month = jan,

doi = "10.1016/j.jvs.2021.06.031",

language = "English",

volume = "75",

pages = "81--89.e5",

journal = "Journal of Vascular Surgery",

issn = "0741-5214",

publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Results from a nationwide prospective registry on open surgical or endovascular repair of juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms

AU - von Meijenfeldt, Gerdine C.I.

AU - Alberga, Anna J.

AU - Balm, Ron

AU - Vahl, Anco C.

AU - Verhagen, Hence J.M.

AU - Blankensteijn, Jan D.

AU - Zeebregts, Clark J.

AU - van der Laan, Maarten J.

N1 - Funding Information: The authors would like to thank all surgeons (in training), registrars, physician assistants, and administrative nurses who registered all the patients in the DSAA, the Dutch Surgical Aneurysm Audit group, for their time and effort. Publisher Copyright: © 2021 The Authors

PY - 2022/1

Y1 - 2022/1

N2 - Background: Juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (JRAAAs) can be treated either with open surgical repair (OSR) including suprarenal clamping or by complex endovascular aneurysm repair (cEVAR). In this study, we present the comparison between the short-term mortality and complications of the elective JRAAA treatment modalities from a national database reflecting daily practice in The Netherlands. Methods: All patients undergoing elective JRAAA open repair or cEVAR (fenestrated EVAR or chimney EVAR) between January 2016 and December 2018 registered in the Dutch Surgical Aneurysm Audit (DSAA) were eligible for inclusion. Descriptive perioperative variables and outcomes were compared between patients treated with open surgery or endovascularly. Adjusted odds ratios for short-term outcomes were calculated by logistic regression analysis. Results: In all, 455 primary treated patients with JRAAAs could be included (258 OSR, 197 cEVAR). Younger patients and female patients were treated more often with OSR vs cEVAR (72 ± 6.1 vs 76 ± 6.0; P <.001 and 22% vs 15%; P =.047, respectively). Patients treated with OSR had significantly more major and minor complications as well as a higher chance of early mortality (OSR vs cEVAR, 45% vs 21%; P <.001; 34% vs 23%; P =.011; and 6.6% vs 2.5%; P =.046, respectively). After logistic regression with adjustment for confounders, patients who were treated with OSR showed an odds ratio of 3.64 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.25-5.89; P <.001) for major complications compared with patients treated with cEVAR, and for minor complications, the odds ratios were 2.17 (95% CI, 1.34-3.53; P =.002) higher. For early mortality, the odds ratios were 3.79 (95% CI, 1.26-11.34; P =.017) higher after OSR compared with cEVAR. Conclusions: In this study, after primary elective OSR for JRAAA, the odds for major complications, minor complications, and short-term mortality were significantly higher compared with cEVAR.

AB - Background: Juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (JRAAAs) can be treated either with open surgical repair (OSR) including suprarenal clamping or by complex endovascular aneurysm repair (cEVAR). In this study, we present the comparison between the short-term mortality and complications of the elective JRAAA treatment modalities from a national database reflecting daily practice in The Netherlands. Methods: All patients undergoing elective JRAAA open repair or cEVAR (fenestrated EVAR or chimney EVAR) between January 2016 and December 2018 registered in the Dutch Surgical Aneurysm Audit (DSAA) were eligible for inclusion. Descriptive perioperative variables and outcomes were compared between patients treated with open surgery or endovascularly. Adjusted odds ratios for short-term outcomes were calculated by logistic regression analysis. Results: In all, 455 primary treated patients with JRAAAs could be included (258 OSR, 197 cEVAR). Younger patients and female patients were treated more often with OSR vs cEVAR (72 ± 6.1 vs 76 ± 6.0; P <.001 and 22% vs 15%; P =.047, respectively). Patients treated with OSR had significantly more major and minor complications as well as a higher chance of early mortality (OSR vs cEVAR, 45% vs 21%; P <.001; 34% vs 23%; P =.011; and 6.6% vs 2.5%; P =.046, respectively). After logistic regression with adjustment for confounders, patients who were treated with OSR showed an odds ratio of 3.64 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.25-5.89; P <.001) for major complications compared with patients treated with cEVAR, and for minor complications, the odds ratios were 2.17 (95% CI, 1.34-3.53; P =.002) higher. For early mortality, the odds ratios were 3.79 (95% CI, 1.26-11.34; P =.017) higher after OSR compared with cEVAR. Conclusions: In this study, after primary elective OSR for JRAAA, the odds for major complications, minor complications, and short-term mortality were significantly higher compared with cEVAR.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85116404121&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.06.031

DO - 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.06.031

M3 - Article

C2 - 34197942

AN - SCOPUS:85116404121

SN - 0741-5214

VL - 75

SP - 81-89.e5

JO - Journal of Vascular Surgery

JF - Journal of Vascular Surgery

IS - 1

ER -

Results from a nationwide prospective registry on open surgical or endovascular repair of juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this