Abstract
SummaryDespite compelling evidence for sex-based differences in cardiovascular disease, current guidelines for cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) remain predominantly informed by male-centric data. Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is less prevalent in female individuals. As a result, female patients were less frequently enrolled in early landmark CRT trials (comprising only ∼20% of participants), thus limiting the statistical power needed to detect meaningful female-specific outcomes. Emerging evidence suggests that female patients derive greater benefit from CRT at shorter QRS durations (130–149 ms) compared to male patients (≥150 ms), particularly those with left bundle branch block and non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy. Structural, electrical, and device programming differences may contribute to enhanced reverse remodelling and better clinical outcomes in females. However, these findings are seldomly reflected in guideline recommendations and rarely impact clinical decision-making, leading to underuse of CRT in eligible female patients. This Viewpoint calls for the integration of sex-specific analyses in CRT research, sex-specific recommendations in guidelines, and enhanced clinician awareness of sex-based differences.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 103894 |
| Journal | EClinicalMedicine |
| Volume | 94 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Apr 2026 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright: © 2026 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Resynchronising care: addressing sex differences in cardiac resynchronisation therapy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver