Revisiting the link between the sustained attention to response task (SART) and daily-life cognitive failures

Annika M. Schepers, Leonie Schorrlepp*, Juriena D. de Vries, Tamara de Kloe, Dimitri van der Linden, Erik Bijleveld

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this study, we examined the relationship between errors of commission on the Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART) and scores on the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ). The goal was to assess the ecological validity of the SART in a sample of people scoring high on fatigue complaints. SART errors of commission were positively associated with CFQ scores and this finding remained after controlling for fatigue level, age, and SART reaction times. Thus, our results generally supported the ecological validity of the SART. However, when examining subsamples separately, we found the association between SART and CFQ only in our subsample of employees, not in our subsample of university students. The three subscales of the CFQ showed the same pattern of findings. Our results imply that, when using the SART to draw conclusions about everyday life, it is crucial to consider the characteristics of one's sample and control for relevant confounding variables.

Original languageEnglish
Article number103558
JournalConsciousness and Cognition
Volume114
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright: © 2023 The Authors

Research programs

  • ESSB PSY

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Revisiting the link between the sustained attention to response task (SART) and daily-life cognitive failures'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this