Risk factor contributions to socioeconomic inequality in cardiovascular risk in the Philippines: a cross-sectional study of nationally representative survey data

Callum Brindley*, Tom Van Ourti, Joseph Capuno, Aleli Kraft, Jenny Kudymowa, Owen O’Donnell

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
7 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) increasingly relies on monitoring global CVD risk scores. Lack of evidence on socioeconomic inequality in these scores and the contributions that specific risk factors make to this inequality impedes effective targeting of CVD prevention. We aimed to address this evidence gap by measuring and decomposing socioeconomic inequality in CVD risk in the Philippines. Methods: We used data on 8462 individuals aged 40–74 years from the Philippines National Nutrition Survey and the laboratory-based Globorisk equation to predict 10-year risk of a CVD event from sex, age, systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, high blood glucose, and smoking. We used a household wealth index to proxy socioeconomic status and measured socioeconomic inequality with a concentration index that we decomposed into contributions of the risk factors used to predict CVD risk. We measured socioeconomic inequalities in these risk factors and decomposed them into contributions of more distal risk factors: body mass index, fat share of energy intake, low physical activity, and drinking alcohol. We stratified by sex. Results: Wealthier individuals, particularly males, had greater exposure to all risk factors, with the exception of smoking, and had higher CVD risks. Total cholesterol and high blood glucose accounted for 58% and 34%, respectively, of the socioeconomic inequality in CVD risk among males. For females, the respective estimates were 63% and 69%. Systolic blood pressure accounted for 26% of the higher CVD risk of wealthier males but did not contribute to inequality among females. If smoking prevalence had not been higher among poorer individuals, then the inequality in CVD risk would have been 35% higher for males and 75% higher for females. Among distal risk factors, body mass index and fat intake contributed most to inequalities in total cholesterol, high blood sugar, and, for males, systolic blood pressure. Conclusions: Wealthier Filipinos have higher predicted CVD risks and greater exposure to all risk factors, except smoking. There is need for a nuanced approach to CVD prevention that targets anti-smoking programmes on the poorer population while targeting diet and exercise interventions on the wealthier.

Original languageEnglish
Article number689
JournalBMC Public Health
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 Apr 2023

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
JC, AK, OO’D were supported by funding from the Swiss National Science Foundation ( https://www.snf.ch ) and the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation ( https://www.eda.admin.ch/deza/en/home.html ) through the Swiss Programme for Research on Global Issues for Development ( http://www.r4d.ch ) grant 400640_160374 (PI: Jürgen Maurer). CB and TVO were supported by the Smarter Choices for Better Health initiative of Erasmus University Rotterdam. The content of the Article is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the views of the funders, who had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Publisher Copyright: © 2023, The Author(s).

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Risk factor contributions to socioeconomic inequality in cardiovascular risk in the Philippines: a cross-sectional study of nationally representative survey data'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this