Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Safety, immunogenicity, and optimal dosing of a modified vaccinia Ankara-based vaccine against MERS-CoV in healthy adults: a phase 1b, double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled clinical trial

  • Matthijs P. Raadsen
  • , Christine Dahlke
  • , MVA-MERS-S_DF-1 Study group
  • , Anahita Fathi
  • , Svenja Hardtke
  • , Michael Klüver
  • , Verena Krähling
  • , Gesche K. Gerresheim
  • , Leonie Mayer
  • , Anna Z. Mykytyn
  • , Leonie M. Weskamm
  • , Tamara Zoran
  • , Eric C.M. van Gorp
  • , Gerd Sutter
  • , Stephan Becker
  • , Bart L. Haagmans*
  • , Marylyn M. Addo*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
  • Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine
  • German Center for Infection Research (DZIF)
  • Universität Marburg
  • German Center for Infection Research (Marburg)
  • Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)
154 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: 

MERS-CoV is a respiratory pathogen with a case-fatality rate of 36%, and for which no vaccines are currently licensed. MVA-MERS-S is a candidate vaccine based on recombinant modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA). In this study, the safety, immunogenicity, and optimal dose schedule of MVA-MERS-S was assessed in individuals with previous exposure to SARS-CoV-2 infections and vaccines. 

Methods: 

We conducted a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled phase 1b clinical trial at two university medical centres in Germany and the Netherlands. Healthy volunteers aged 18–55 years were assigned by computer randomisation to receive three intramuscular injections of 107 or 108 plaque-forming units (PFU) of MVA-MERS-S, with two treatment groups each of either 28-day or 56-day intervals between the initial two doses, and one control arm that received only placebo, at a ratio of 2:2:2:2:1. The third dose was given after 224 days. The sponsor, clinical and laboratory staff, and participants were masked to both vaccine dose and dosing interval. The primary outcome was safety, assessed in the all participants who had received at least one injection; daily solicited vaccine reactions were recorded after each dose for 7 days, unsolicited adverse events for 28 days, and serious adverse events throughout the study. The secondary outcome was humoral immunogenicity, measured with vaccine-induced geometric mean antibody concentrations and seroconversion rates, analysed in all participants who received at least three allocated treatments. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04119440) and is completed. 

Findings: 

Between 26 July, 2021, and 3 March, 2022, 244 volunteers were screened, 177 of whom were eligible and 140 were randomly assigned either to the 28-day 107 PFU group (n=32), 56-day 107 PFU group (n=31), 28-day 108 PFU group (n=31), 56-day 108 PFU group (n=30), or placebo group (n=16). In total, 178 doses were administered of 107 PFU of MVA-MERS-S, 174 of 108 PFU, and 164 doses of placebo, and 139 participants received at least one injection. 73 (53%) were female and 66 (48%) were male. No serious vaccine-related adverse events occurred. Solicited local reactions were mild in 288 (93%, 95% CI 90–96) of 309 reports and consisted primarily of pain or tenderness. Pain or tenderness (of any severity) occurred after 69 (39%, 32–46) of 178 107 PFU injections, 138 (79%; 73–85) of 174 108 PFU injections, and 18 (11%; 7–11) of 164 placebo injections. Of 595 reported solicited systemic reactions, 479 (81%, 77–83) were graded as mild. Systemic reactions of any grade occurred after 77 (43%; 36–51) 107 PFU injections, 102 (59%; 51–66) 108 PFU injections, and 67 (41%; 34–49) of 164 placebo injections. At 28 days after the second dose, MERS-CoV neutralising antibodies were highest for participants assigned to 56-day 108 PFU, with geometric mean ratios of 7·2 (95% CI 3·9–13·3) for the 56-day 108 PFU group versus the 28-day 108 PFU group (p<0·0001), 3·9 (2·1–7·2) for the 56-day 108 PFU group versus the 56-day 107 PFU group (p=0·0031), and 5·4 (2·9–10·0) for the 56-day 108 PFU group versus the 28-day 107 PFU group (p=0·0003). 

Interpretation: 

MVA-MERS-S was safe and immunogenic in individuals with previous and concurrent SARS-CoV-2 exposure. The second vaccination with the 108 PFU dose of MVA-MERS-S elicited a stronger humoral immune response when administered 56 days after the first dose than a 28-day interval. Further studies are needed to verify these findings in groups at risk for MERS-CoV exposure, and at risk of severe disease, including older individuals and those with relevant comorbidities. 

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)231-242
Number of pages12
JournalThe Lancet Infectious Diseases
Volume25
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Elsevier Ltd

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Safety, immunogenicity, and optimal dosing of a modified vaccinia Ankara-based vaccine against MERS-CoV in healthy adults: a phase 1b, double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled clinical trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this