Abstract
A reduced VAT rate can apply to works of art. The definition of art which is
used for this beneficial treatment, can differ from the definition of art which experts use.
This is particularly the case when regarding photographs. The central question in this article is to whether this different view can be based on inherent characteristics of VAT as
the Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ) claims. In order to answer this question,
the article will start with a short overview of the benefits for works of art, followed by the
definitions used for customs duties and VAT. The core part of this article includes an
analysis of the case law applying these definitions to photographs: the 1989 Raab case and
the 2019 Regards case.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1-18 |
Number of pages | 18 |
Journal | UCPH Fiscal Relations Law Journal (FIRE Journal) |
Volume | 2020 |
Issue number | 1 |
Publication status | Published - 2020 |
Bibliographical note
geen doiResearch programs
- SAI 2007-05 FA