Abstract
Although reference dependence plays a central role in explaining behavior, little is
known about the way reference points are selected. This paper identifies empirically
which reference point people use in decision under risk. We assume a comprehensive
reference-dependent model that nests the main reference-dependent theories,
including prospect theory, and that allows isolating the reference point rule from other
behavioral parameters. Our experiment involved high stakes with payoffs up to a week’s
salary. We used an optimal design to select the choices in the experiment and Bayesian
hierarchical modeling for estimation. The most common reference points were the
status quo and a security level (the maximum of the minimal outcomes of the prospects
in a choice). We found little support for the use of expectations-based reference points.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 93-112 |
Number of pages | 20 |
Journal | Management Science |
Volume | 66 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2020 |
Research programs
- EMC NIHES-05-63-03 Competition