Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Selected stage IV rectal cancer patients managed by the watch-and-wait approach after pelvic radiotherapy: a good alternative to total mesorectal excision surgery?

  • Petra A. Custers*
  • , Britt J.P. Hupkens
  • , the Dutch Watch-and-Wait Consortium
  • , Brechtje A. Grotenhuis
  • , Koert F.D. Kuhlmann
  • , Stéphanie O. Breukink
  • , Geerard L. Beets
  • , Jarno Melenhorst
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Netherlands Cancer Institute
  • Maastricht University
  • The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)
57 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Aim: 

The aim of this study was to assess the clinical and oncological outcome of a selected group of stage IV rectal cancer patients managed by the watch-and-wait approach following a (near-)complete response of the primary rectal tumour after radiotherapy. 

Method: 

Patients registered in the Dutch watch-and-wait registry since 2004 were selected when diagnosed with synchronous stage IV rectal cancer. Data on patient characteristics, treatment details, follow-up and survival were collected. The 2-year local regrowth rate, organ-preservation rate, colostomy-free rate, metastatic progression-free rate and 2- and 5-year overall survival were analysed. 

Results: 

After a median follow-up period of 35 months, local regrowth was observed in 17 patients (40.5%). Nine patients underwent subsequent total mesorectal excision, resulting in a permanent colostomy in four patients. The 2-year local regrowth rate was 39.9%, the 2-year organ-preservation rate was 77.1%, the 2-year colostomy-free rate was 88.1%, and the 2-year metastatic progression-free rate was 46.7%. The 2- and 5-year overall survival rates were 92.0% and 67.5%. 

Conclusion: 

The watch-and-wait approach can be considered as an alternative to total mesorectal excision in a selected group of stage IV rectal cancer patients with a (near-)complete response following pelvic radiotherapy. Despite a relatively high regrowth rate, total mesorectal excision and a permanent colostomy can be avoided in the majority of these patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)401-410
Number of pages10
JournalColorectal Disease
Volume24
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. Colorectal Disease published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Selected stage IV rectal cancer patients managed by the watch-and-wait approach after pelvic radiotherapy: a good alternative to total mesorectal excision surgery?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this