Selection fairnes and outcomes: A field study of interactive effects on applicants reactions

S Schinkel, A van Vianen, Dirk van Dierendonck

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

24 Citations (Scopus)


Despite the vast amount of applicant reactions studies, few have examined combined effects of selection outcomes with perceived procedural and distributive fairness on both personal and organizational reactions. Further, most have been conducted in laboratory settings, limiting external validity. The present study examined these effects with a longitudinal design, measuring actual applicants' well-being and organizational attractiveness preinterview and postoutcome. As expected, several interactions between outcomes and fairness were found. Applicants who were hired reported both highest well-being and organizational attractiveness when they perceived the outcome as fair. In contrast, applicants who were rejected reported highest well-being when they thought the outcome was unfair. Selection outcome and procedural fairness interacted for organizational attractiveness, with higher procedural fairness leading to higher attractiveness for rejected applicants.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)22-31
Number of pages10
JournalInternational Journal of Selection and Assessment
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Research programs



Dive into the research topics of 'Selection fairnes and outcomes: A field study of interactive effects on applicants reactions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this