Abstract
Self-reported motives for residential immobility are important for understanding why people remain in place, yet existing survey measures vary widely and suffer from a lack of standardisation. We review self-report measures about motives for immobility or constraints to moving—measured with survey items asking what made it difficult for respondents to relocate—in ten existing surveys. We report several advantages and disadvantages of different approaches and provide recommendations for future questionnaire design. Based on descriptive statistics from available survey measures and on the wording of the questions and response options, we pinpoint situations where questionnaire design rather than respondents' true motivations might influence answer patterns. We provide eight recommendations to guide future research design, focusing on question wording, sample selection, and response options and structure. This review provides a starting point for standardizing the measurement of immobility motives, enabling future researchers to make informed research design decisions and improve cross-study comparability.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | e70240 |
| Journal | Population, Space and Place |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Mar 2026 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2026 The Author(s). Population, Space and Place published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Self-Reported Motives for Immobility or Constraints to Moving: A Review and Assessment of Ten Survey Measures'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver