Semi-Automatic Quantification of Subsolid Pulmonary Nodules: Comparison with Manual Measurements

ET Scholten, B de Hoop, C Jacobs, S van de Vorst, RJ Klaveren, M Oudkerk, R (Rozemarijn) Vliegenthart, Harry de Koning, Carlijn van der Aalst, WTM Mali, HA Gietema, M Prokop, Berbke Ginneken, PA Jong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

23 Citations (Scopus)
3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Rationale: Accurate measurement of subsolid pulmonary nodules (SSN) is becoming increasingly important in the management of these nodules. SSNs were previously quantified with time-consuming manual measurements. The aim of the present study is to test the feasibility of semi-automatic SSNs measurements and to compare the results to the manual measurements. Methods: In 33 lung cancer screening participants with 33 SSNs, the nodules were previously quantified by two observers manually. In the present study two observers quantified these nodules by using semi-automated nodule volumetry software. Nodules were quantified for effective diameter, volume and mass. The manual and semi-automatic measurements were compared using Bland-Altman plots and paired T tests. Observer agreement was calculated as an intraclass correlation coefficient. Data are present Results: Semi-automated measurements were feasible in all 33 nodules. Nodule diameter, volume and mass were 11.2 (3.3) mm, 935 (691) ml and 379 (311) milligrams for observer 1 and 11.1 (3.7) mm, 986 (797) ml and 399 (344) milligrams for observer 2, respectively. Agreement between observers and within observer 1 for the semi-automatic measurements was good with an intraclass correlation coefficient >0.89. For observer 1 and observer 2, measured diameter was 8.8% and 10.3% larger (p<0.001), measur Conclusion: Semi-automated measurement of the diameter, volume and mass of SSNs is feasible with good observer agreement. Semi-automated measurement makes quantification of mass and volume feasible in daily practice.
Original languageUndefined/Unknown
JournalPLoS One (print)
Volume8
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Cite this