TY - JOUR
T1 - Setting positive end-expiratory pressure
T2 - The use of esophageal pressure measurements
AU - Somhorst, Peter
AU - Mousa, Amne
AU - Jonkman, Annemijn H.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024/2/1
Y1 - 2024/2/1
N2 - Purpose of reviewTo summarize the key concepts, physiological rationale and clinical evidence for titrating positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) using transpulmonary pressure (PL) derived from esophageal manometry, and describe considerations to facilitate bedside implementation.Recent findingsThe goal of an esophageal pressure-based PEEP setting is to have sufficient PLat end-expiration to keep (part of) the lung open at the end of expiration. Although randomized studies (EPVent-1 and EPVent-2) have not yet proven a clinical benefit of this approach, a recent posthoc analysis of EPVent-2 revealed a potential benefit in patients with lower APACHE II score and when PEEP setting resulted in end-expiratory PLvalues close to 0 ± 2 cmH2O instead of higher or more negative values. Technological advances have made esophageal pressure monitoring easier to implement at the bedside, but challenges regarding obtaining reliable measurements should be acknowledged.SummaryEsophageal pressure monitoring has the potential to individualize the PEEP settings. Future studies are needed to evaluate the clinical benefit of such approach.
AB - Purpose of reviewTo summarize the key concepts, physiological rationale and clinical evidence for titrating positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) using transpulmonary pressure (PL) derived from esophageal manometry, and describe considerations to facilitate bedside implementation.Recent findingsThe goal of an esophageal pressure-based PEEP setting is to have sufficient PLat end-expiration to keep (part of) the lung open at the end of expiration. Although randomized studies (EPVent-1 and EPVent-2) have not yet proven a clinical benefit of this approach, a recent posthoc analysis of EPVent-2 revealed a potential benefit in patients with lower APACHE II score and when PEEP setting resulted in end-expiratory PLvalues close to 0 ± 2 cmH2O instead of higher or more negative values. Technological advances have made esophageal pressure monitoring easier to implement at the bedside, but challenges regarding obtaining reliable measurements should be acknowledged.SummaryEsophageal pressure monitoring has the potential to individualize the PEEP settings. Future studies are needed to evaluate the clinical benefit of such approach.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85181459350&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/MCC.0000000000001120
DO - 10.1097/MCC.0000000000001120
M3 - Review article
C2 - 38062927
AN - SCOPUS:85181459350
SN - 1070-5295
VL - 30
SP - 28
EP - 34
JO - Current Opinion in Critical Care
JF - Current Opinion in Critical Care
IS - 1
ER -