Abstract
We argue that statistical practice in the social and behavioural sciences benefits from transparency, a fair acknowledgement of uncertainty and openness to alternative interpretations. Here, to promote such a practice, we recommend seven concrete statistical procedures: (1) visualizing data; (2) quantifying inferential uncertainty; (3) assessing data preprocessing choices; (4) reporting multiple models; (5) involving multiple analysts; (6) interpreting results modestly; and (7) sharing data and code. We discuss their benefits and limitations, and provide guidelines for adoption. Each of the seven procedures finds inspiration in Merton’s ethos of science as reflected in the norms of communalism, universalism, disinterestedness and organized scepticism. We believe that these ethical considerations—as well as their statistical consequences—establish common ground among data analysts, despite continuing disagreements about the foundations of statistical inference.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1473-1480 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Nature Human Behaviour |
Volume | 5 |
Issue number | 11 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 10 Nov 2021 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:We are grateful to N. Lazar for her comments on a draft version. We thank everyone who was involved in drafting the initial list of statistical procedures during the hackathon that took place at the 2019 meeting of the Society for the Improvement of Psychological Science in Rotterdam, The Netherlands. This work was supported in part by a European Research Council (ERC) grant to E.-J.W. (no. 283876), a Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) grant to A. Sarafoglou (no. 406-17-568), as well as a Dutch scientific organization Vidi grant from the NWO to D.v.R. (no. 016.Vidi.188.001).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, Springer Nature Limited.