Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Sex differences in hemodynamics and outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement

  • Henning Guthoff
  • , Mohamed Abdel-Waha
  • , IMPPACT TAVR Investigators
  • , Won Keun Kim
  • , Hendrik Wienemann
  • , Jasmin Shamekhi
  • , Clemens Eckel
  • , Ina von der Heide
  • , Verena Veulemans
  • , Martin Landt
  • , Jury Schewel
  • , Nicolas M. Van Mieghem
  • , Rik Adrichem
  • , Stefan Toggweiler
  • , Tobias Rheude
  • , Sascha Macherey-Meyer
  • , Sabine Bleiziffer
  • , Baravan Al-Kassou
  • , Stephan Nienaber
  • , Jan Wrobel
  • Ines Richter, Helge Möllmann, Matthias Renker, Efstratios Charitos, Niklas Schofer, Tobias Zeus, Tobias Schmidt, Philipp von Stein, Holger Thiele, Guy Witberg, Matti Adam, Stephan Baldus, Tanja K. Rudolph, Victor Mauri*
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: 

Women remain underrepresented in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) trials, despite well-recognized anatomical differences that necessitate tailored procedural strategies. This study assessed sex-specific differences in baseline characteristics, procedural approaches, hemodynamic outcomes, and their impact on 5-year all-cause mortality. 

Methods: 

We analyzed data from 20,094 patients in the IMPPACT TAVR registry. Hemodynamic outcomes, including prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM), were defined according to Valve Academic Research Consortium-3 criteria. Kaplan–Meier and Cox models assessed 5-year all-cause mortality, and logistic regression identified predictors of PPM. 

Results: 

Women comprised 49.1% of the cohort. They were older (81.4 vs. 80.2 years, p < 0.001), more symptomatic (NYHA ≥ III: 74.4% vs. 67.6%, p < 0.001), and more frequently received self-expanding valves (66.5% vs. 45.7%, p < 0.001). Post-TAVR indexed effective orifice areas were slightly larger in women (1.01 ± 0.28 vs. 0.99 ± 0.27cm2/m2, p < 0.001). Five-year mortality was lower in women (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.76–0.86, p < 0.001). Severe PPM occurred less frequently in women (4.0% vs. 4.5%, p < 0.001) and was associated with increased mortality only in men (HR 1.32, 95% CI 1.10–1.59, p = 0.002). Adjustment for comorbidities nullified the association between PPM and mortality in both sexes. 

Conclusions: 

In this international TAVR cohort, women, despite being older, demonstrated better survival than men, with comparable postprocedural hemodynamic outcomes. Severe PPM was associated with increased mortality only in men, likely reflecting underlying comorbidities and low-flow states. After adjustment for confounders, PPM was no longer associated with survival in either sex. These findings underscore the need for strategies accounting for both procedural and patient-specific risks, beyond prosthesis hemodynamics.

Original languageEnglish
JournalClinical Research in Cardiology
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Nov 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sex differences in hemodynamics and outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this