Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Sex differences in kidney replacement therapy initiation and maintenance

  • Marlies Antlanger
  • , Marlies Noordzij
  • , Moniek van de Luijtgaarden
  • , ERA-EDTA Registry
  • , Juan Jesus Carrero
  • , Runolfur Palsson
  • , Patrik Finne
  • , Marc H. Hemmelder
  • , Nuria Aresté-Fosalba
  • , Anna Varberg Reisæter
  • , Aleix Cases
  • , Jamie P. Traynor
  • , Reinhard Kramar
  • , Ziad Massy
  • , Kitty J. Jager
  • , Manfred Hecking*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Medical University of Vienna
  • Kepler University Hospital GmbH and Johannes Kepler University
  • Amsterdam UMC
  • Radboud University Medical Center
  • Karolinska Institutet
  • Landspitali University Hospital
  • University of Iceland
  • Helsinki University Central Hospital
  • Finnish Registry for Kidney Diseases
  • Nefrovisie Foundation
  • Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena
  • University of Oslo
  • University of Barcelona
  • Catalan Registry of Renal Patients
  • Information Services Division Scotland
  • Austrian Dialysis and Transplant Registry
  • Hôpital Ambroise Paré
  • Université Versailles St-Quentin-en-Yvelines

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

57 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and objectives More men than women undergo kidney replacement therapy (KRT) despite a larger number of women being affected by CKD. The aim of this multinational European study was to explore whether there might be historic and geographic trends in sex-specific incidence and prevalence of various KRT modalities. Design, setting, participants, & measurements We assessed sex-specific differences in KRT incidence and prevalence using data from nine countries reporting to the European Renal Association–European Dialysis and Transplant Association (ERA-EDTA) Registry for at least 40 years, during the period 1965–2015. Sex distribution data were compared with the European general population (Eurostat). Statistical methodology included basic descriptive statistics, incidence and prevalence calculations per million population (pmp), as well as their male-to-female ratios. Analyses were stratified by age group and diabetic status. Results We analyzed data from 230,378 patients receiving KRT (38% women). For all KRT modalities, the incidence and prevalence rates were consistently higher in men than women. For example, the KRT incidence increased from 8 pmp in 1965–1974 to 98 pmp in 2005–2015 in women, whereas it rose from 12 to 173 pmp in men during the same period. Male-to-female ratios, calculated for incident and prevalent KRT patients, increased with age (range 1.2– 2.4), showing consistency over decades and for individual countries, despite marked changes in primary kidney disease (diabetes more prevalent than glomerulonephritis in recent decades). The proportion of kidney transplants decreased less with age in incident and prevalent men compared with women on KRT. Stratified analysis of patients who were diabetic versus nondiabetic revealed that the male-to-female ratio was markedly higher for kidney transplantation in patients with diabetes. Conclusions Since the beginning of KRT programs reporting to the ERA-EDTA Registry since the 1960s, fewer women than men have received KRT. The relative difference between men and women initiating and undergoing KRT has remained consistent over the last five decades and in all studied countries.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1616-1625
Number of pages10
JournalClinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Volume14
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 Nov 2019
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, American Society of Nephrology. All rights reserved.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sex differences in kidney replacement therapy initiation and maintenance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this