Should we focus on endometrial-free closure technique?

Carry Verberkt, Sanne I. Stegwee, Judith A.F. Huirne

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/Letter to the editorProfessional

Abstract

To the Editors:
We appreciate the thoughtful and constructive feedback on our recent article “Single-layer vs double-layer uterine closure during cesarean delivery: 3-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial (2Close study).”1,2 The insights provided by the author align with our own reflections, particularly regarding the high incidence of gynecological symptoms after cesarean sections (CSs). Indeed, while our study found no significant differences in obstetrical complications between single- and double-layer uterine closure, the prevalence of these symptoms warrants a reexamination of current techniques. [...]

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e109-e110
JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume232
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2025

Bibliographical note

© 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Should we focus on endometrial-free closure technique?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this