Should we use criteria or eyeballing to reject post-interruption tracings?

R Veugelers; Corine Penning; SPJ Grootscholten; PJFM Merkus; HGM Arets; Rob Rieken; JE Brussee; M Jilderda-Janssen; Dick Tibboel; H.M. Evenhuis

doi:10.1002/ppul.20471

Should we use criteria or eyeballing to reject post-interruption tracings?

R Veugelers, Corine Penning, SPJ Grootscholten, PJFM Merkus, HGM Arets, Rob Rieken, JE Brussee, M Jilderda-Janssen, Dick Tibboel, Evenhuis

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Original language	Undefined/Unknown
Pages (from-to)	937-946
Number of pages	10
Journal	Pediatric Pulmonology
Volume	41
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.20471
Publication status	Published - 2006

Access to Document

10.1002/ppul.20471

http://hdl.handle.net/1765/65166

Cite this

@article{b94d11f95bbc461187fddd64f8494981,

title = "Should we use criteria or eyeballing to reject post-interruption tracings?",

author = "R Veugelers and Corine Penning and SPJ Grootscholten and PJFM Merkus and HGM Arets and Rob Rieken and JE Brussee and M Jilderda-Janssen and Dick Tibboel and Evenhuis",

year = "2006",

doi = "10.1002/ppul.20471",

language = "Undefined/Unknown",

volume = "41",

pages = "937--946",

journal = "Pediatric Pulmonology",