TY - JOUR
T1 - Single-time-point dosimetry using model selection and the Bayesian fitting method
T2 - A proof of concept
AU - Patrianesha, Bisma B.
AU - Peters, Steffie M.B.
AU - Hardiansyah, Deni
AU - Ritawidya, Rien
AU - Privé, Bastiaan M.
AU - Nagarajah, James
AU - Konijnenberg, Mark W.
AU - Glatting, Gerhard
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica e Sanitaria
PY - 2025/1
Y1 - 2025/1
N2 - Purpose: This study aimed to determine the effect of model selection on simplified dosimetry for the kidneys using Bayesian fitting (BF) and single-time-point (STP) imaging. Methods: Kidney biokinetics data of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 from mHSPC were collected using SPECT/CT after injection of (3.1 ± 0.1) GBq at time points T1(2.3 ± 0.5), T2(23.8 ± 2.0), T3(47.7 ± 2.2), T4(71.8 ± 2.2), and T5(167.4 ± 1.9) h post-injection. Eleven functions with various parameterizations and a combination of shared and individual parameters were used for model selection. Model averaging of functions with an Akaike weight of >10 % was used to calculate the reference TIAC (TIACREF). STP BF method (STP-BF) was performed to determine the STP TIACs (TIACSTP-BF). The STP-BF performance was assessed by calculating the root-mean-square error (RMSE) of relative deviation between TIACSTP-BF and TIACREF. In addition, the STP-BF performance was compared to the Hänscheid Method. Results: The function A1e-λ1+λphyst+A2e-λ2+λphyst-A1+A2e-λbc+λphyst with shared parameter λ2 was selected as the best function (Akaike weight of 57.91 %). STP-BF using the best function resulted in RMSEs of 20.3 %, 9.1 %, 8.4 %, 13.6 %, and 19.3 % at T1, T2, T3, T4, and T5, respectively. The RMSEs of STP-Hänscheid were 22.4 %, 14.6 %, and 21.9 % at T2, T3, and T4, respectively. Conclusion: A model selection was presented to determine the fit function for calculating TIACs in STP-BF. This study shows that the STP dosimetry using BF and model selection performed better than the frequently used STP Hänscheid method.
AB - Purpose: This study aimed to determine the effect of model selection on simplified dosimetry for the kidneys using Bayesian fitting (BF) and single-time-point (STP) imaging. Methods: Kidney biokinetics data of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 from mHSPC were collected using SPECT/CT after injection of (3.1 ± 0.1) GBq at time points T1(2.3 ± 0.5), T2(23.8 ± 2.0), T3(47.7 ± 2.2), T4(71.8 ± 2.2), and T5(167.4 ± 1.9) h post-injection. Eleven functions with various parameterizations and a combination of shared and individual parameters were used for model selection. Model averaging of functions with an Akaike weight of >10 % was used to calculate the reference TIAC (TIACREF). STP BF method (STP-BF) was performed to determine the STP TIACs (TIACSTP-BF). The STP-BF performance was assessed by calculating the root-mean-square error (RMSE) of relative deviation between TIACSTP-BF and TIACREF. In addition, the STP-BF performance was compared to the Hänscheid Method. Results: The function A1e-λ1+λphyst+A2e-λ2+λphyst-A1+A2e-λbc+λphyst with shared parameter λ2 was selected as the best function (Akaike weight of 57.91 %). STP-BF using the best function resulted in RMSEs of 20.3 %, 9.1 %, 8.4 %, 13.6 %, and 19.3 % at T1, T2, T3, T4, and T5, respectively. The RMSEs of STP-Hänscheid were 22.4 %, 14.6 %, and 21.9 % at T2, T3, and T4, respectively. Conclusion: A model selection was presented to determine the fit function for calculating TIACs in STP-BF. This study shows that the STP dosimetry using BF and model selection performed better than the frequently used STP Hänscheid method.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85211017933&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104868
DO - 10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104868
M3 - Article
C2 - 39642576
AN - SCOPUS:85211017933
SN - 1120-1797
VL - 129
JO - Physica Medica
JF - Physica Medica
M1 - 104868
ER -