## Abstract

The notorious ‘measurement problem’ has been roving around quantum mechanics for nearly a century since its inception, and has given rise to a variety of ‘interpretations’ of quantum mechanics, which are meant to evade it. We argue that no less than six problems need to be distinguished, and that several of them classify as different types of problems. One of them is what traditionally is called ‘the measurement problem’. Another of them has nothing to do with measurements but is a profound metaphysical problem. We also analyse critically Maudlin’s (Topoi 14:7–15, 1995) well-known statement of ‘three measurements problems’, and the clash of the views of Brown (Found Phys 16:857–870, 1986) and Stein (Maximal of an impossibility theorem concerning quantum measurement. In: R. S. Cohen et al. (Eds.), Potentiality, entanglement and passion-at-a-distance, 1997) on one of the six measurement problems. Finally, we summarise a solution to one measurement problem which has been largely ignored but tacitly if not explicitly acknowledged.

Original language | English |
---|---|

Title of host publication | Non-Reflexive Logics, Non-Individuals, and the Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics |

Pages | 225-259 |

Number of pages | 35 |

ISBN (Electronic) | 978-3-031-31840-5 |

DOIs | |

Publication status | Published - 20 Apr 2023 |

### Publication series

Series | Synthese Library |
---|---|

ISSN | 0166-6991 |

### Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG. 2023.