Social status determines how we monitor and evaluate our performance.

Maarten Boksem, E Kostermans, B Milivojevic, D (David) De Cremer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

48 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)


Since people with low status are more likely to experience social evaluative threat and are therefore more inclined to monitor for these threats and inhibit approach behaviour, we expected that low-status subjects would be more engaged in evaluating their own performance, compared with high-status subjects. We created a highly salient social hierarchy based on the performance of a simple time estimation task. Subjects could achieve high, middle or low status while performing this task simultaneously with other two players who were either higher or lower in status. Subjects received feedback on their own performance, as well as on the performance of the other two players simultaneously. Electroencephalography (EEG) was recorded from all three participants. The results showed that medial frontal negativity (an event-related potential reflecting performance evaluation) was significantly enhanced for low-status subjects. Implications for status-related differences in goal-directed behaviour are discussed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)304-313
Number of pages10
JournalSocial Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2012


Dive into the research topics of 'Social status determines how we monitor and evaluate our performance.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this