Spinal manipulation and mobilisation for back and neck pain: A blinded review

B. W. Koes*, W. J.J. Assendelft, G. J.M.G. Van der Heijden, L. M. Bouter, P. G. Knipschild

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

231 Citations (Scopus)
2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objective - To assess the efficacy of spinal manipulation for patients with back or neck pain. Design - Computer aided search for published papers and blinded assessment of the methods of the studies. Subjects - 35 randomised clinical trials comparing spinal manipulation with other treatments. Main outcome measures - Score for quality of methods (based on four main categories: study population, interventions, measurement of effect, and data presentation and analysis) and main conclusion of author(s) with regard to spinal manipulation. Results - No trial scored 60 or more points (maximum score 100) suggesting that most were of poor quality. Eighteen studies (51%) showed favourable results for manipulation. In addition, five studies (14%) reported positive results in one or more subgroups. Of the four studies with 50-60 points, one reported that manipulation was better, two reported that manipulation was better in only a subgroup, and one reported that manipulation was no better or worse than reference treatment. Eight trials attempted to compare manipulation with some placebo, with inconsistent results. Conclusions - Although some results are promising, the efficacy of manipulation has not been convincingly shown. Further trials are needed, but much more attention should be paid to the methods of study.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1298-1303
Number of pages6
JournalBritish Medical Journal
Volume303
Issue number6813
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 23 Nov 1991
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Spinal manipulation and mobilisation for back and neck pain: A blinded review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this