Stratified Failure: Educational Stratification and Students’ Attributions of their Mathematics Performance in 24 Countries

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Country rankings based on the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) invite politicians and specialists to speculate about the reasons their countries did well or failed to do well. Rarely, however, do we hear from the students on whose performance these rankings are based. This omission is unfortunate for two reasons. First, research suggests that how students explain their academic performance has important consequences for their future achievements. Second, prior studies show that students’ attributions of success and failure in education can develop into explanations for social inequalities in adulthood. This article draws on PISA 2012 data on 128,110 secondary school students in 24 countries to explore how educational stratification shapes students’ explanations of their academic performance. I find that students in mixed-ability groups tend to attribute their mathematics performance to their teachers and to (bad) luck, whereas vocational- and academic-track students are more likely to blame themselves for not doing well. These differences between mixed-ability group students and tracked students are more pronounced in school systems where tracking is more extensive. I conclude by discussing how these findings speak to the broader impact of educational stratification on students’ psychology and cognition and the legitimation of inequalities.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)137-153
Number of pages16
JournalSociology of Education
Volume89
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Mar 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Stratified Failure: Educational Stratification and Students’ Attributions of their Mathematics Performance in 24 Countries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this