18F-FDG PET/CT in Infective Endocarditis: Indications and Approaches for Standardization

D. ten Hove*, R. H.J.A. Slart, B. Sinha, A. W.J.M. Glaudemans, R. P.J. Budde

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose of Review: Additional imaging modalities, such as FDG-PET/CT, have been included into the workup for patients with suspected infective endocarditis, according to major international guidelines published in 2015. The purpose of this review is to give an overview of FDG-PET/CT indications and standardized approaches in the setting of suspected infective endocarditis. Recent Findings: There are two main indications for performing FDG-PET/CT in patients with suspected infective endocarditis: (i) detecting intracardiac infections and (ii) detection of (clinically silent) disseminated infectious disease. The diagnostic performance of FDG-PET/CT for intracardiac lesions depends on the presence of native valves, prosthetic valves, or implanted cardiac devices, with a sensitivity that is poor for native valve endocarditis and cardiac device-related lead infections, but much better for prosthetic valve endocarditis and cardiac device-related pocket infections. Specificity is high for all these indications. The detection of disseminated disease may also help establish the diagnosis and/or impact patient management. Summary: Based on current evidence, FDG-PET/CT should be considered for detection of disseminated disease in suspected endocarditis. Absence of intracardiac lesions on FDG-PET/CT cannot rule out native valve endocarditis, but positive findings strongly support the diagnosis. For prosthetic valve endocarditis, standard use of FDG-PET/CT is recommended because of its high sensitivity and specificity. For implanted cardiac devices, FDG-PET/CT is also recommended, but should be evaluated with careful attention to clinical context, because its sensitivity is high for pocket infections, but low for lead infections. In patients with prosthetic valves with or without additional aortic prosthesis, combination with CTA should be considered. Optimal timing of FDG-PET/CT is important, both during clinical workup and technically (i.e., post tracer injection). In addition, procedural standardization is key and encompasses patient preparation, scan acquisition, reconstruction, subsequent analysis, and clinical interpretation. The recommendations discussed here will hopefully contribute to improved standardization and enhanced performance of FDG-PET/CT in the clinical management of patients with suspected infective endocarditis.

Original languageEnglish
Article number130
JournalCurrent Cardiology Reports
Volume23
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 Aug 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This work was supported in part by PUSH, a collaborative framework project of the University Medical Center Groningen and Siemens Healthineers. The funding source had no role in the conceptualization, analyses, writing, or publication of the article.

Funding Information:
Dr. ten Hove, Dr. Glaudemans, Dr. Slart, and Dr. Sinha report the aforementioned institutional funding through PUSH. Additionally, Dr. Sinha reports grants from Beatrixoord Foundation, grants from the European Union, outside the submitted work, and Committee work (executive boards) on a local and national level dealing with guideline development of infections. Dr. Budde reports grants from HeartFlow and Siemens, outside the submitted work.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s).

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '18F-FDG PET/CT in Infective Endocarditis: Indications and Approaches for Standardization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this