Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Surgical Outcome After Distal Pancreatectomy With and Without Portomesenteric Venous Resection in Patients with Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Transatlantic Evaluation of Patients in North America, Germany, Sweden, and The Netherlands (GAPASURG)

  • Thomas F. Stoop
  • , Simone Augustinus
  • , Bergthor Bjornsson
  • , Global Audits on Pancreatic Surgery Group (GAPASURG)
  • , Bobby Tingstedt
  • , Bodil Andersson
  • , Christopher L. Wolfgang
  • , Jens Werner
  • , Karin Johansen
  • , Martijn W. J. Stommel
  • , Matthew H. G. Katz
  • , Michael Ghadimi
  • , Michael G. House
  • , Poya Ghorbani
  • , I. Quintus Molenaar
  • , Roeland F. de Wilde
  • , J. Sven D. Mieog
  • , Tobias Keck
  • , Ulrich F. Wellner
  • , Waldemar Uhl
  • Marc G. Besselink, Henry A. Pitt, Marco Del Chiaro
  • University of Colorado System
  • University of Amsterdam
  • Karolinska Institutet
  • Linkoping University
  • Lund University
  • New York University
  • Technical University of Munich
  • Radboud University Nijmegen
  • University of Texas System
  • University of Gottingen
  • Indiana University System
  • Utrecht University
  • Leiden University
  • Kiel University
  • Ruhr University Bochum
  • Rutgers University System

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)
32 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BackgroundPancreatic adenocarcinoma located in the pancreatic body might require a portomesenteric venous resection (PVR), but data regarding surgical risks after distal pancreatectomy (DP) with PVR are sparse. Insight into additional surgical risks of DP-PVR could support preoperative counseling and intraoperative decision making. This study aimed to provide insight into the surgical outcome of DP-PVR, including its potential risk elevation over standard DP.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective, multicenter study including all patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma who underwent DP +/- PVR (2018-2020), registered in four audits for pancreatic surgery from North America, Germany, Sweden, and The Netherlands. Patients who underwent concomitant arterial and/or multivisceral resection(s) were excluded. Predictors for in-hospital/30-day major morbidity and mortality were investigated by logistic regression, correcting for each audit.ResultsOverall, 2924 patients after DP were included, of whom 241 patients (8.2%) underwent DP-PVR. Rates of major morbidity (24% vs. 18%; p = 0.024) and post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage grade B/C (10% vs. 3%; p = 0.041) were higher after DP-PVR compared with standard DP. Mortality after DP-PVR and standard DP did not differ significantly (2% vs. 1%; p = 0.542). Predictors for major morbidity were PVR (odds ratio [OR] 1.500, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.086-2.071) and conversion from minimally invasive to open surgery (OR 1.420, 95% CI 1.032-1.970). Predictors for mortality were higher age (OR 1.087, 95% CI 1.045-1.132), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR 4.167, 95% CI 1.852-9.374), and conversion from minimally invasive to open surgery (OR 2.919, 95% CI 1.197-7.118), whereas concomitant PVR was not associated with mortality.ConclusionsPVR during DP for pancreatic adenocarcinoma in the pancreatic body is associated with increased morbidity, but can be performed safely in terms of mortality.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)8327-8339
Number of pages13
JournalAnnals of Surgical Oncology
Volume31
Issue number12
Early online date9 Aug 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Surgical Outcome After Distal Pancreatectomy With and Without Portomesenteric Venous Resection in Patients with Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Transatlantic Evaluation of Patients in North America, Germany, Sweden, and The Netherlands (GAPASURG)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this