Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Surveillance of adults with congenital heart disease: Current guidelines and actual clinical practice

  • Jolien W. Roos-Hesselink*
  • , Chiara Pelosi
  • , Margarita Brida
  • , Julie De Backer
  • , Sabine Ernst
  • , Werner Budts
  • , Helmut Baumgartner
  • , Erwin Oechslin
  • , Daniel Tobler
  • , Adrienne H. Kovacs
  • , Giovanni Di Salvo
  • , Jolanda Kluin
  • , Michael A. Gatzoulis
  • , Gerhard P. Diller
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Rijeka
  • Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust
  • Imperial College London
  • Ghent University Hospital
  • University Hospitals Leuven
  • University Hospital Münster
  • Peter Munk Cardiac Centre
  • Universitätsspital Basel
  • Equilibria Psychological Health
  • Azienda Ospedaliera di Padova
  • Aristotle University of Thessaloniki School of Medicine
  • King's College London

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)
39 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background and aim: 

Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the most common birth defect with prevalence of 0.8%. Thanks to tremendous progress in medical and surgical practice, nowadays, >90% of children survive into adulthood. Recently European Society of Cardiology (ESC), American College of Cardiology (ACC)/ American Heart Association (AHA) issued guidelines which offer diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations for the different defect categories. However, the type of technical exams and their frequency of follow-up may vary largely between clinicians and centres. We aimed to present an overview of available diagnostic modalities and describe current surveillance practices by cardiologists taking care of adults with CHD (ACHD).

Methods and results: 

A questionnaire was used to assess the frequency cardiologists treating ACHD for at least one year administrated the most common diagnostic tests for ACHD. The most frequently employed diagnostic modalities were ECG and echocardiography for both mild and moderate/severe CHD. Sixty-seven percent of respondents reported that they routinely address psychosocial well-being. 

Conclusion: 

Differences exist between reported current clinical practice and published guidelines. This is particularly true for the care of patients with mild lesions. In addition, some differences exist between ESC and American guidelines, with more frequent surveillance suggested by the Americans.

Original languageEnglish
Article number132022
JournalInternational Journal of Cardiology
Volume407
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Jul 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Surveillance of adults with congenital heart disease: Current guidelines and actual clinical practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this