Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Survival prediction in glioblastoma: 10-year follow-up from the Dutch Neurosurgery Quality Registry

  • Jeroen T.J.M. van Dijck
  • , Hilko Ardon
  • , the Quality Registry Neuro Surgery glioblastoma working group from the Dutch Society of Neurosurgery
  • , Rutger K. Balvers
  • , Eelke M. Bos
  • , Lisette Bosscher
  • , H. Bart Brouwers
  • , Vincent K.Y. Ho
  • , Koos Hovinga
  • , Lesley Kwee
  • , Mark ter Laan
  • , Rob J.A. Nabuurs
  • , Pierre A.J.T. Robe
  • , Sarita van Geest
  • , Olivier van der Veer
  • , Niels Verburg
  • , Michiel Wagemakers
  • , Philip C. de Witt Hamer
  • , Mar Rodriguez Girondo
  • , Rishi D.S. Nandoe Tewarie*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Haaglanden Medisch Centrum
  • Leiden University
  • ETZ Elisabeth
  • Isala Clinics
  • Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL)
  • Maastricht University
  • Northwest Clinics
  • Radboud University Medical Center
  • Utrecht University
  • Martini Ziekenhuis
  • Medisch Spectrum Twente
  • Amsterdam UMC
  • University Medical Centre Groningen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)
76 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose: 

Glioblastoma is the most common and treatment-resistant primary malignant brain tumor, with high morbidity and mortality despite standard treatment protocols. This study aims to evaluate survival and prognostic factors, and introduce two pragmatic prognostic models to inform individualized, patient-centered decision-making, using a large Dutch registry. 

Methods: 

We analyzed a prospective cohort of 7621 patients (2012–2022) in 12 Dutch centers via the Dutch Quality Registry Neurosurgery. Univariate analysis of prognostic factors, Kaplan–Meier survival curves, and funnel plots comparing center performance (30-day and 2-year mortality) were conducted. Two prognostic models using multivariate Cox regression were developed. 

Results: 

Glioblastoma incidence was 3.9/100.000 in The Netherlands. Overall, 30-day mortality was 5.1% and 2-year survival 17.8%. Overall median survival was 10.4 months, with 4.6 months after biopsy and 12.9 months post-resection. Poorer survival correlated with older age, higher ASA classification, lower Karnofsky Performance Status, biopsy over resection (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.47–0.52), and postoperative complications (HR 1.57 95% CI 1.39–1.79). MGMT promotor methylation (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.53–0.63) and adjuvant treatment were linked to lower mortality. Treatment variation and outcomes were within expected ranges; surgical volume did not affect survival. The prognostic models had C-indices of 0.704 (6-month) and 0.721 (2-year). 

Conclusion: 

Surgical resection and adjuvant therapy improved survival, but prognosis remained poor. Age, premorbid condition, treatment and molecular markers influenced survival. Center variations were within expected range, and higher surgical volume did not improve outcomes. The developed prognostic models could potentially inform clinicians, pending external validation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)753-764
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Neuro-Oncology
Volume174
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Survival prediction in glioblastoma: 10-year follow-up from the Dutch Neurosurgery Quality Registry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this