Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Systematic review and quality assessment of clinical and economic evidence for superabsorbent wound dressings in a population with chronic ulcers

  • Vladica M. Veličković*
  • , Tom Macmillan
  • , Emma Lones
  • , Yana Arlouskaya
  • , Pablo Arija Prieto
  • , Neil Webb
  • , Amy Crompton
  • , Isobel Munro
  • , Viviane Fernandes Carvalho
  • , Szijártó Attila
  • , Dávid Bárdos
  • , Yun Nan Lin
  • , Hao Yu Chiao
  • , Sebastian Probst
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Evidence Generation Department
  • Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and HTA
  • Source Health Economics
  • Universidade Guarulhos
  • Hartmann (Brazil)
  • Semmelweis University
  • Kaohsiung Medical University
  • Triservice General Hospital Taiwan
  • University of Applied Sciences Western Switzerland
  • University of Galway
  • Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management (ESHPM)

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)
53 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Effective exudate management is key for optimal ulcer healing. Superabsorbent dressings are designed to have high fluid handling capacity, reduced risk of exudate leakage, fluid retention under compression, and to sequester harmful exudate components. This study aimed to systematically identify existing evidence for the clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of superabsorbent dressings for the treatment of moderate-to-highly exudating chronic ulcers of various etiologies. The aim is focused on examining the ‘class’ effect of all superabsorbers, not any particular dressing. Clinical and cost effectiveness systematic reviews were conducted, searching Embase, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature. The Cost Effectiveness Analysis Registry and Econ papers were also searched for the economic review. Outcomes of interest included ulcer closure, dressing properties, hospital- and infection-related outcomes, safety, and economic outcomes. Fourteen studies were included in the clinical systematic review. Eleven were case series, with one randomised controlled trial, one retrospective matched observational study, and one retrospective cohort study. The studies investigated eight superabsorbent dressings and were heterogeneous in their patient population and outcomes. Superabsorbent dressings may result in favourable outcomes, including reductions in frequency of dressing change and pain scores. As most studies were case series, drawing firm conclusions was difficult due to absence of a comparator arm. The economic systematic review identified seven studies, five of which were cost-utility analyses. These suggested superabsorbent dressings are a more cost-effective option for the treatment of chronic ulcers compared with standard dressings. However, the small number and low quality of studies identified in both reviews highlights the need for future research.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere14750
JournalInternational Wound Journal
Volume21
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2024
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Systematic review and quality assessment of clinical and economic evidence for superabsorbent wound dressings in a population with chronic ulcers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this